filebench for example
On 4/17/07, Torrey McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tony Galway wrote:
>
> I had previously undertaken a benchmark that pits "out of box"
> performance of UFS via SVM, VxFS and ZFS but was waylaid due to some
> outstanding availability issues in ZFS. These have been taken
Tony Galway wrote:
I had previously undertaken a benchmark that pits “out of box”
performance of UFS via SVM, VxFS and ZFS but was waylaid due to some
outstanding availability issues in ZFS. These have been taken care of,
and I am once again undertaking this challenge on behalf of my
custome
Hello Tony,
Monday, April 16, 2007, 7:10:41 PM, you wrote:
>
I had previously undertaken a benchmark that pits “out of box” performance of UFS via SVM, VxFS and ZFS but was waylaid due to some outstanding availability issues in ZFS. These have been taken care of, and I am once again unde
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 16, 2007 2:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Testing of UFS, VxFS and ZFS
Is the VxVM volume 8-wide? It is not clear from your creation commands.
-- richard
Tony Galway wrote:
>
>
&g
On April 16, 2007 10:51:41 AM -0700 Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On April 16, 2007 1:10:41 PM -0400 Tony Galway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I had previously undertaken a benchmark that pits "out of box"
performance
...
The test hardware is a T2000 connected to a 12 disk SE3510 (prese
On 4/16/07, Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but there is another article somewhere
about tuning for t2000, related to PCI on the t2000, ie it is
t2000-specific.
This one??
http://blogs.sun.com/ValdisFilks/entry/improving_i_o_throughput_for
Rayson
-frank
__
On April 16, 2007 1:10:41 PM -0400 Tony Galway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had previously undertaken a benchmark that pits "out of box" performance
...
The test hardware is a T2000 connected to a 12 disk SE3510 (presenting as
...
Now to my problem - Performance! Given the test as defined ab
Did you measure CPU utilization by any chance during the tests?
Its T2000 and CPU cores are quite slow on this box hence might be a
bottleneck.
just a guess.
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:10 -0400, Tony Galway wrote:
> I had previously undertaken a benchmark that pits “out of box”
> performance of UFS
