On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 02:12:09AM -0700, Steve Bennett wrote:
> > How did you measure it? (I'm not saying it doesn't
> > take those 45kB - just I haven't checked it myself
> > and I wonder how you checked it).
>
> ran 'top', looked at 'mem free'
> created 1000 filesystems
> ran 'top' again.
> reb
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:20:56PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> btw: I belive it was discussed here before - it would be great if one
> would automatically convert given directory on zfs filesystem into zfs
> filesystem (without actually copying all data)
Yep, and an RFE filed: 6400399 want "
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:55:45
To:Steve Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Supporting ~10K users on ZFS
Steve Bennett wrote:
OK, I know that there's been some discussion on this before, but I'm not sure
t
.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Supporting ~10K users on ZFS
Steve Bennett wrote:
>OK, I know that there's been some discussion on this before, but I'm not sure
>that any specific advice came out of it. What would the advice be for
>supporting a largish number of users (10,000
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 23:07, Steve Bennett wrote:
> >From what little I currently understand, the general advice would
> seem to be to assign a filesystem to each user, and to set a quota
> on that. I can see this being OK for small numbers of users (up to
> 1000 maybe), but I can also see it bei
Steve Bennett wrote:
OK, I know that there's been some discussion on this before, but I'm not sure
that any specific advice came out of it. What would the advice be for
supporting a largish number of users (10,000 say) on a system that supports
ZFS? We currently use vxfs and assign a user quo
OK, I know that there's been some discussion on this before, but I'm not sure
that any specific advice came out of it. What would the advice be for
supporting a largish number of users (10,000 say) on a system that supports
ZFS? We currently use vxfs and assign a user quota, and backups are done
