On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, Richard Elling wrote:
>
> Let's do some math. A generally accepted Soft Error Rate (SER) for
> DRAMs is
> 1,000 FITs or an Annualized Failure Rate (AFR) of 0.88%. If a non-ECC DIMM
> has 8 chips then your AFR is 7%, or 14% for 16 chip DIMMs. My desktop
> has 4 DIMMs at 16-ch
On Mon 17/11/08 09:17 , Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
> Ian Collins wrote:
>
> > ZFS also uses system RAM in a way it hasn't been
> used before. Memory> that would have been unused or holding static
> pages is now churning> rapidly, in a way similar memory testers like
> memtest86. Rand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> RTL8211C IP checksum offload is broken. You can disable it, but you
>> have to edit /etc/system. See CR 6686415 for details.
>> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6686415
>> -- richard
>>
>
>
> I think the proper way to state this is "the d
Ian Collins wrote:
> Al Hopper wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> dick hoogendijk wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:49:17 +1300
Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:38:53 -0600
"Al Hopper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I guess I've been lucky also
> - but IMHO the failure rate for RAM these days is pretty small[1].
> I've also been around hundreds of SPARC boxes and, again, very, few
> RAM failures (one is all that I can remember).
>
Al Hopper wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> dick hoogendijk wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:49:17 +1300
>>> Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > WD Cavi
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dick hoogendijk wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:49:17 +1300
>> Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
> WD Caviar Black drive [...] Intel E7200 2.53GHz 3MB L2
> The P45 b
>Henrik Johansson wrote:
>> On Nov 15, 2008, at 11:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
I went for a AM2+ GeForce 8200 motherboard which seemed more stable
with Solaris than 8300. With the AM2+ socket I can wait for the new
45nm CPUs, I bought the cheapest dual-core I could find
dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >>
>>> >>> > WD Caviar Black drive [...] Intel E7200 2.53GHz 3MB L2
>>> >>> > The P45 based boards are a no-brainer
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 16G of DDR2-1066 with P45 or
>>> >>> 8G of ECC DDR2-800
Henrik Johansson wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2008, at 11:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>> I went for a AM2+ GeForce 8200 motherboard which seemed more stable
>>> with Solaris than 8300. With the AM2+ socket I can wait for the new
>>> 45nm CPUs, I bought the cheapest dual-core I could find for now
dick hoogendijk wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:49:17 +1300
> Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> > WD Caviar Black drive [...] Intel E7200 2.53GHz 3MB L2
>>> > The P45 based boards are a no-brainer
>>>
>>> 16G of DDR2-1066 with P45 or
>>> 8G of
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:49:17 +1300
Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > WD Caviar Black drive [...] Intel E7200 2.53GHz 3MB L2
> > > The P45 based boards are a no-brainer
> >
> > 16G of DDR2-1066 with P45 or
> > 8G of ECC DDR2-800 with 3210 based boards
> >
>
On Nov 15, 2008, at 11:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>> I went for a AM2+ GeForce 8200 motherboard which seemed more stable
>> with Solaris than 8300. With the AM2+ socket I can wait for the new
>> 45nm CPUs, I bought the cheapest dual-core I could find for now
>> (which
>> did not supp
>I looked at this a month back, i was leaning towards intel for
>performance and power consumption but went for AMD doe to lack of ECC
>support in most of the Intel chipsets.
>
>I went for a AM2+ GeForce 8200 motherboard which seemed more stable
>with Solaris than 8300. With the AM2+ socket
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > WD Caviar Black drive [...] Intel E7200 2.53GHz 3MB L2
> > The P45 based boards are a no-brainer
>
> 16G of DDR2-1066 with P45 or
> 8G of ECC DDR2-800 with 3210 based boards
>
> That is the question.
>
>
I guess the answer is how valuable is your data?
--
Ian.
> WD Caviar Black drive [...] Intel E7200 2.53GHz 3MB L2
> The P45 based boards are a no-brainer
16G of DDR2-1066 with P45 or
8G of ECC DDR2-800 with 3210 based boards
That is the question.
Rob
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discu
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Al Hopper wrote:
>>
>> b) If I were building a system today, I'd go Intel - even thought I'm
>> an AMD fanboy - but I can't recommend AMD today ... unfortunately.
>
> Is there some particular reason
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Al Hopper wrote:
>
> b) If I were building a system today, I'd go Intel - even thought I'm
> an AMD fanboy - but I can't recommend AMD today ... unfortunately.
Is there some particular reason for this? The now shipping 0.45
micron quad-core Opterons seem quite nice indeed.
I looked at this a month back, i was leaning towards intel for
performance and power consumption but went for AMD doe to lack of ECC
support in most of the Intel chipsets.
I went for a AM2+ GeForce 8200 motherboard which seemed more stable
with Solaris than 8300. With the AM2+ socket I can w
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:43 PM, gnomad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Like many others, I am looking to put together a SOHO NAS based on ZFS/CIFS.
> The plan is 6 x 1TB drives in RAIDZ2 configuration, driven via mobo with 6
> SATA ports.
>
> I've read most, if not all, of the threads here, as wel
gnomad wrote:
> So, my questions:
>
> - Has the MCP55 copy/fs lockup bug been fixed yet?
>
>
Which bug ids? I've never seen any such problems in 18 months of heavy
use. Note the x4540 uses these.
> - Have the Nvidia 750a driver issues been resolved?
>
>
Which bug ids?
--
Ian.
___
Like many others, I am looking to put together a SOHO NAS based on ZFS/CIFS.
The plan is 6 x 1TB drives in RAIDZ2 configuration, driven via mobo with 6 SATA
ports.
I've read most, if not all, of the threads here, as well as sbredon's excellent
article on building a home NAS, yet I still have a
22 matches
Mail list logo
