Hello Nicholas,
Wednesday, January 3, 2007, 5:08:25 PM, you wrote:
>
I agree this needs to be corrected and am glad to see that a bug was open for it. Do you know what the bugid is for it?
I don't know the bug id however
http://www.mail-archive.com/zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org/msg
I agree this needs to be corrected and am glad to see that a bug was open
for it. Do you know what the bugid is for it?
On 1/2/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Nicholas,
Tuesday, January 2, 2007, 10:10:29 PM, you wrote:
>
You may want to check some of the past posti
Hello Nicholas,
Tuesday, January 2, 2007, 10:10:29 PM, you wrote:
>
You may want to check some of the past postings to this list as I believe what you are seeing has already been discussed already. If I remember correctly this is a "feature" of zfs and is designed to protect the integrit
You may want to check some of the past postings to this list as I believe
what you are seeing has already been discussed already. If I remember
correctly this is a "feature" of zfs and is designed to protect the
integrity of the data on the zfs file system.
On 1/2/07, Willem van Schaik <[EMAIL PR
Played over Xmas a bit with ZFS on mirrored USB sticks. Which was fun
When I pulled both sticks without doing any unmount, the filesystem
seemed to be still there, all in cache of course. I even could open a
file in vi, but when I then tried to save the file, I had expected a
failure, but
