>-Original Message-
>From: Ross Walker [mailto:rswwal...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 7:08 AM
>>
>> We are currently porting over our existing Learning Lab Infrastructure
>> platform from MS Virtual Server to VBox + ZFS. When students
>> connect into
>> their lab environment it
On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
From: Ross Walker [mailto:rswwal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 6:34 AM
On Apr 20, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Geoff Nordli
wrote:
If you combine the hypervisor and storage server and have students
connect to the VMs via RDP or VNC or
>From: Ross Walker [mailto:rswwal...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 6:34 AM
>
>On Apr 20, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
>
>
>If you combine the hypervisor and storage server and have students
>connect to the VMs via RDP or VNC or XDM then you will have the
>performance of local
On Apr 20, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
From: matthew patton [mailto:patto...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:54 PM
Geoff Nordli wrote:
With our particular use case we are going to do a "save
state" on their
virtual machines, which is going to write 100-400 MB
per VM v
>From: matthew patton [mailto:patto...@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:54 PM
>
>Geoff Nordli wrote:
>
>> With our particular use case we are going to do a "save
>> state" on their
>> virtual machines, which is going to write 100-400 MB
>> per VM via CIFS or
>> NFS, then we take a sna
Geoff Nordli wrote:
> With our particular use case we are going to do a "save
> state" on their
> virtual machines, which is going to write 100-400 MB
> per VM via CIFS or
> NFS, then we take a snapshot of the volume, which
> guarantees we get a
> consistent copy of their VM.
maybe you left out
>From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 10:17 PM
>
>Hi Geoff,
>The Canucks have already won their last game of the season :-)
>more below...
Hi Richard,
I didn't watch the game last night, but obviously Vancouver better pick up
their socks or they wi
Hi Geoff,
The Canucks have already won their last game of the season :-)
more below...
On Apr 18, 2010, at 11:21 PM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
>> On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Tony MacDoodle wrote:
>>
>>> I was wondering if any data was lost while doing a snapshot on a
>> running system?
>>
>> ZFS wil
>On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Tony MacDoodle wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if any data was lost while doing a snapshot on a
>running system?
>
>ZFS will not lose data during a snapshot.
>
>> Does it flush everything to disk or would some stuff be lost?
>
>Yes, all ZFS data will be committed to disk a
On Apr 16, 2010, at 3:27 AM, Maurilio Longo wrote:
> Richard,
>
>> Applications can take advantage of this and there are services available
>> to integrate ZFS snapshots with Oracle databases, Windows clients, etc.
>
> which services are you referring to?
Nexenta offers plugins to integrate Ora
Richard,
> Applications can take advantage of this and there are services available
> to integrate ZFS snapshots with Oracle databases, Windows clients, etc.
which services are you referring to?
best regards.
Maurilio.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Tony MacDoodle wrote:
> I was wondering if any data was lost while doing a snapshot on a running
> system?
ZFS will not lose data during a snapshot.
> Does it flush everything to disk or would some stuff be lost?
Yes, all ZFS data will be committed to disk and then
A snapshot is a picture of the storage at a point in time so
everything depends on the applications using the storage. If you're
running a db with lots of cache it's probably a good idea to stop the
service or force a flush to disk before taking the snapshot to ensure
the integrity of the d
I was wondering if any data was lost while doing a snapshot on a running
system? Does it flush everything to disk or would some stuff be lost?
Thanks
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zf
14 matches
Mail list logo
