Re: [zfs-discuss] Snapshot that won't go away.

2010-01-18 Thread Ian Collins
Daniel Carosone wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 05:52:25PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote: Is it the parent snapshot for a clone? I'm almost certain it isn't. I haven't created any clones and none show in zpool history. What about snapshot holds? I don't know if (and doubt wheth

Re: [zfs-discuss] Snapshot that won't go away.

2010-01-18 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 05:52:25PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote: >> Is it the parent snapshot for a clone? >> > I'm almost certain it isn't. I haven't created any clones and none show > in zpool history. What about snapshot holds? I don't know if (and doubt whether) these are in S10, but since

Re: [zfs-discuss] Snapshot that won't go away.

2010-01-17 Thread Ian Collins
Daniel Carosone wrote: On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 06:21:45PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote: I have a Solaris 10 update 6 system with a snapshot I can't remove. zfs destroy -f reports the device as being busy. fuser doesn't shore any process using the filesystem and it isn't shared. Is it

Re: [zfs-discuss] Snapshot that won't go away.

2010-01-17 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 06:21:45PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote: > I have a Solaris 10 update 6 system with a snapshot I can't remove. > > zfs destroy -f reports the device as being busy. fuser doesn't > shore any process using the filesystem and it isn't shared. Is it the parent snapshot for a c

[zfs-discuss] Snapshot that won't go away.

2010-01-16 Thread Ian Collins
I have a Solaris 10 update 6 system with a snapshot I can't remove. zfs destroy -f reports the device as being busy. fuser doesn't shore any process using the filesystem and it isn't shared. I can unmount the filesystem OK. Any clues or suggestions of bigger sticks to hit it with? -- Ian.