On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 04:20:10PM -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
> We have an IMAP e-mail server running on a Solaris 10 10/09 system.
> It uses six ZFS filesystems built on a single zpool with 14 daily
> snapshots. Every day at 11:56, a cron command destroys the oldest
> snapshots and creates new ones
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:23:10PM -0800, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> On 03/08/10 12:43, Tomas Ögren wrote:
> So we tried adding 2x 4GB USB sticks (Kingston Data
> >Traveller Mini Slim) as metadata L2ARC and that seems to have pushed the
> >snapshot times down to about 30 seconds.
>
> Out of curiosit
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 03:18:34PM -0500, Miles Nordin wrote:
> > "gm" == Gary Mills writes:
>
> gm> destroys the oldest snapshots and creates new ones, both
> gm> recursively.
>
> I'd be curious if you try taking the same snapshots non-recursively
> instead, does the pause go away?
On 08 March, 2010 - Bill Sommerfeld sent me these 0,4K bytes:
> On 03/08/10 12:43, Tomas Ögren wrote:
> So we tried adding 2x 4GB USB sticks (Kingston Data
>> Traveller Mini Slim) as metadata L2ARC and that seems to have pushed the
>> snapshot times down to about 30 seconds.
>
> Out of curiosity,
On 03/08/10 12:43, Tomas Ögren wrote:
So we tried adding 2x 4GB USB sticks (Kingston Data
Traveller Mini Slim) as metadata L2ARC and that seems to have pushed the
snapshot times down to about 30 seconds.
Out of curiosity, how much physical memory does this system have?
On 08 March, 2010 - Miles Nordin sent me these 1,8K bytes:
> > "gm" == Gary Mills writes:
>
> gm> destroys the oldest snapshots and creates new ones, both
> gm> recursively.
>
> I'd be curious if you try taking the same snapshots non-recursively
> instead, does the pause go away?
> "gm" == Gary Mills writes:
gm> destroys the oldest snapshots and creates new ones, both
gm> recursively.
I'd be curious if you try taking the same snapshots non-recursively
instead, does the pause go away?
Because recursive snapshots are special: they're supposed to
atomically s
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 04:20:10PM -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
> We have an IMAP e-mail server running on a Solaris 10 10/09 system.
> It uses six ZFS filesystems built on a single zpool with 14 daily
> snapshots. Every day at 11:56, a cron command destroys the oldest
> snapshots and creates new ones
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 07:51:13PM -0300, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
>
>On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Ian Collins <[1]...@ianshome.com>
>wrote:
>
>Gary Mills wrote:
>
> We have an IMAP e-mail server running on a Solaris 10 10/09 system.
> It uses six ZFS filesystems bu
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> Gary Mills wrote:
>
>> We have an IMAP e-mail server running on a Solaris 10 10/09 system.
>> It uses six ZFS filesystems built on a single zpool with 14 daily
>> snapshots. Every day at 11:56, a cron command destroys the oldest
>> snapshots a
Gary Mills wrote:
We have an IMAP e-mail server running on a Solaris 10 10/09 system.
It uses six ZFS filesystems built on a single zpool with 14 daily
snapshots. Every day at 11:56, a cron command destroys the oldest
snapshots and creates new ones, both recursively. For about four
minutes ther
Gary Mills wrote:
We have an IMAP e-mail server running on a Solaris 10 10/09 system.
It uses six ZFS filesystems built on a single zpool with 14 daily
snapshots. Every day at 11:56, a cron command destroys the oldest
snapshots and creates new ones, both recursively. For about four
minutes ther
We have an IMAP e-mail server running on a Solaris 10 10/09 system.
It uses six ZFS filesystems built on a single zpool with 14 daily
snapshots. Every day at 11:56, a cron command destroys the oldest
snapshots and creates new ones, both recursively. For about four
minutes thereafter, the load ave
13 matches
Mail list logo
