> So that leaves us with a Samba vs NFS issue (not
> related to
> ZFS). We know that NFS is able to create file _at
> most_ at
> one file per server I/O latency. Samba appears better
> and this is
> what we need to investigate. It might be better in a
> way
> that NFS can borrow (maybe through some
Joe S wrote:
I have a couple of performance questions.
Right now, I am transferring about 200GB of data via NFS to my new
Solaris server. I started this YESTERDAY. When writing to my ZFS pool
via NFS, I notice what I believe to be slow write speeds. My client
hosts vary between a MacBook Pro
I have a couple of performance questions.
Right now, I am transferring about 200GB of data via NFS to my new Solaris
server. I started this YESTERDAY. When writing to my ZFS pool via NFS, I
notice what I believe to be slow write speeds. My client hosts vary between
a MacBook Pro running Tiger to
