On 6 January 2011 20:02, Chris Murray wrote:
> On 5 January 2011 13:26, Edward Ned Harvey
> wrote:
>> One comment about etiquette though:
>>
>
>
> I'll certainly bear your comments in mind in future, however I'm not
> sure what happened to the subject, as I used the interface at
> http://opensola
On 5 January 2011 13:26, Edward Ned Harvey
wrote:
> One comment about etiquette though:
>
I'll certainly bear your comments in mind in future, however I'm not
sure what happened to the subject, as I used the interface at
http://opensolaris.org/jive/. I thought that would keep the subject
the sam
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Chris Murray
>
> Thank you for the feedback. All makes sense.
Sorry to hear about what's probably an unfortunate loss of nonredundant
disk...
One comment about etiquette though:
You chan
Hi Edward,
Thank you for the feedback. All makes sense.
To clarify, yes, I snapshotted the VM within ESXi, not the filesystems within
the pool. Unfortunately, because of my misunderstanding of how ESXi
snapshotting works, I'm now left without the option of investigating whether
the replaced di
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Chris Murray
>
> I have some strange goings-on with my VM of Solaris Express 11, and I
> hope someone can help.
>
> It shares out other virtual machine files for use in ESXi 4.0 (it,
> too, ru
Hi,
I have some strange goings-on with my VM of Solaris Express 11, and I
hope someone can help.
It shares out other virtual machine files for use in ESXi 4.0 (it,
too, runs in there)
I had two disks inside the VM - one for rpool and one for 'vmpool'.
All was fine.
vmpool has some deduped data.
