Re: [zfs-discuss] Serious ZFS problems

2007-09-06 Thread Tim Spriggs
Neil Perrin wrote: > > > Tim Spriggs wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I think I have gained "sufficient fool" status for testing the >> fool-proof-ness of zfs. I have a cluster of T1000 servers running >> Solaris 10 and two x4100's running an OpenSolaris dist (Nexenta) >> which is at b68. Each T1000 h

Re: [zfs-discuss] Serious ZFS problems

2007-09-06 Thread Neil Perrin
Tim Spriggs wrote: > Hello, > > I think I have gained "sufficient fool" status for testing the > fool-proof-ness of zfs. I have a cluster of T1000 servers running > Solaris 10 and two x4100's running an OpenSolaris dist (Nexenta) which > is at b68. Each T1000 hosts several zones each of w

[zfs-discuss] Serious ZFS problems

2007-09-05 Thread Tim Spriggs
Hello, I think I have gained "sufficient fool" status for testing the fool-proof-ness of zfs. I have a cluster of T1000 servers running Solaris 10 and two x4100's running an OpenSolaris dist (Nexenta) which is at b68. Each T1000 hosts several zones each of which has its own zpool associate