On 2 December 2010 16:17, Miles Nordin wrote:
> > "t" == taemun writes:
>
> t> I would note that the Seagate 2TB LP has a 0.32% Annualised
> t> Failure Rate.
>
> bullshit.
>
Apologies, should have read: Specified Annualised Failure Rate.
> "t" == taemun writes:
t> I would note that the Seagate 2TB LP has a 0.32% Annualised
t> Failure Rate.
bullshit.
pgpsMvTxl5Ghd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensol
> Not sure where you got this figure from, the "Barracuda Green"
> (http://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/datasheet/disc/ds1720_barracuda_green.pdf) is
> a different drive to the one we've been talking about in this thread
> (http://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/datasheet/disc/ds_barracuda_lp.pdf).
> I would
On 30 November 2010 03:09, Krunal Desai wrote:
> I assume it either:
>
> 1. does a really good job of 512-byte emulation that results in little
> to no performance degradation
> (
> http://consumer.media.seagate.com/2010/06/the-digital-den/advanced-format-drives-with-smartalign/
> references "te
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Krunal Desai wrote:
> The Seagate datasheet for those parts report 512-byte sectors. What is
> the deal with the ST32000542AS: native 512-byte sectors, native
> 4k-byte sector with selectable emulation, or native 4k-byte sectors
> with 512-byte sector emulation al
> I'm using these drives for one of the vdevs in my pool. The pool was created
> with ashift=12 (zpool binary
> from http://digitaldj.net/2010/11/03/zfs-zpool-v28-openindiana-b147-4k-drives-and-you/),
> which limits the minimum block size to 4KB, the same as the physical block
> size on these drive
On Mon, November 29, 2010 04:50, taemun wrote:
> I would urge you to consider a 2^n + p number of disks. For raidz, p = 1,
> so an acceptable number of total drives is 3, 5 or 9. raidz2 has two
> parity drives, hence 4, 6 or 10. These vdev widths ensure that the data
> blocks are divided into nic
Thanks, I need to try modified zpool than.
On Nov 29, 2010, at 10:50 AM, taemun wrote:
> On 29 November 2010 20:39, GMAIL wrote:
> Does anyone use Seagate ST32000542AS disks with ZFS?
>
> I wonder if the performance is not that ugly as with WD Green WD20EARS disks.
>
> I'm using these drives f
On 29 November 2010 20:39, GMAIL wrote:
> Does anyone use Seagate ST32000542AS disks with ZFS?
>
> I wonder if the performance is not that ugly as with WD Green WD20EARS
> disks.
>
I'm using these drives for one of the vdevs in my pool. The pool was created
with ashift=12 (zpool binary from
http
Hi,
Does anyone use Seagate ST32000542AS disks with ZFS?
I wonder if the performance is not that ugly as with WD Green WD20EARS disks.
Thanks,
--
Piotr Jasiukajtis | estibi | SCA OS0072
http://estseg.blogspot.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-disc
10 matches
Mail list logo
