Re: [zfs-discuss] SATA/SAS (Re: Quantifying ZFS reliability)

2008-10-06 Thread Richard Elling
Anton B. Rang wrote: > Erik: > >>> (2) a SAS drive has better throughput and IOPs than a SATA drive >>> > > Richard: > >> Disagree. We proved that the transport layer protocol has no bearing >> on throughput or iops. Several vendors offer drives which are >> identical in all respect

[zfs-discuss] SATA/SAS (Re: Quantifying ZFS reliability)

2008-10-05 Thread Anton B. Rang
Erik: > > (2) a SAS drive has better throughput and IOPs than a SATA drive Richard: > Disagree. We proved that the transport layer protocol has no bearing > on throughput or iops. Several vendors offer drives which are > identical in all respects except for transport layer protocol: SAS or > SA