Hello Jason,
Sunday, January 14, 2007, 1:26:37 AM, you wrote:
JJWW> Hi Robert,
JJWW> Will build 54 offline the drive?
IIRC there hasn't been ZFS+FMA integration yet.
--
Best regards,
Robertmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mile
Hi Robert,
Will build 54 offline the drive?
Best Regards,
Jason
On 1/13/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Jason,
Saturday, January 13, 2007, 12:06:57 AM, you wrote:
JJWW> Hi Robert,
JJWW> We've experienced luck with flaky SATA drives in our STK array by
JJWW> unseating a
Hello Jason,
Saturday, January 13, 2007, 12:06:57 AM, you wrote:
JJWW> Hi Robert,
JJWW> We've experienced luck with flaky SATA drives in our STK array by
JJWW> unseating and reseating the drive to cause a reset of the firmware. It
JJWW> may be a bad drive, or the firmware may just have hit a bug
Hi Robert,
We've experienced luck with flaky SATA drives in our STK array by
unseating and reseating the drive to cause a reset of the firmware. It
may be a bad drive, or the firmware may just have hit a bug. Hope its
the latter! :-D
I'd be interested why the hot-spare didn't kick in. I thought
Hello zfs-discuss,
One of our drives in x4500 is failing - it periodically
disconnects/connects. ZFS only reports READ errors and no hot-spare
automatically took in which was expected currently.
So I issued zpool replace with a hot-spare drive.
Now it takes forever and it seems like ZF
