Re: [zfs-discuss] Replaced drive in zpool, was fine, now degraded - ohno

2010-04-14 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Jonathan, For a different diagnostic perspective, you might use the fmdump -eV command to identify what FMA indicates for this device. This level of diagnostics is below the ZFS level and definitely more detailed so you can see when these errors began and for how long. Cindy On 04/14/10 11:08,

Re: [zfs-discuss] Replaced drive in zpool, was fine, now degraded - ohno

2010-04-14 Thread Jonathan
> > Do worry about media errors. Though this is the most > common HDD > error, it is also the cause of data loss. > Fortunately, ZFS detected this > and repaired it for you. Right. I assume you do recommend swapping the faulted drive out though? Other file systems may not > be so gracious. >

Re: [zfs-discuss] Replaced drive in zpool, was fine, now degraded - ohno

2010-04-14 Thread Jonathan
Yeah, -- $smartctl -d sat,12 -i /dev/rdsk/c5t0d0 smartctl 5.39.1 2010-01-28 r3054 [i386-pc-solaris2.11] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net Smartctl: Device Read Identity Failed (not an ATA/ATAPI device)

Re: [zfs-discuss] Replaced drive in zpool, was fine, now degraded - ohno

2010-04-14 Thread Richard Elling
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Jonathan wrote: > I just ran 'iostat -En'. This is what was reported for the drive in question > (all other drives showed 0 errors across the board. > > All drives indicated the "illegal request... predictive failure analysis" > --

Re: [zfs-discuss] Replaced drive in zpool, was fine, now degraded - ohno

2010-04-14 Thread Eric Andersen
> I'm on snv 111b. I attempted to get smartmontools > workings, but it doesn't seem to want to work as > these are all sata drives. Have you tried using '-d sat,12' when using smartmontools? opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=473727 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org __

Re: [zfs-discuss] Replaced drive in zpool, was fine, now degraded - ohno

2010-04-14 Thread Jonathan
I just ran 'iostat -En'. This is what was reported for the drive in question (all other drives showed 0 errors across the board. All drives indicated the "illegal request... predictive failure analysis" -- c7t1d0

Re: [zfs-discuss] Replaced drive in zpool, was fine, now degraded - ohno

2010-04-14 Thread Richard Elling
On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:05 AM, Jonathan wrote: > I just started replacing drives in this zpool (to increase storage). I pulled > the first drive, and replaced it with a new drive and all was well. It > resilvered with 0 errors. This was 5 days ago. Just today I was looking > around and noticed t

[zfs-discuss] Replaced drive in zpool, was fine, now degraded - ohno

2010-04-14 Thread Jonathan
I just started replacing drives in this zpool (to increase storage). I pulled the first drive, and replaced it with a new drive and all was well. It resilvered with 0 errors. This was 5 days ago. Just today I was looking around and noticed that my pool was degraded (I see now that this occurred