[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS with SAN Disks and mutipathing

2007-02-23 Thread JS
Yes. Works fine, though it's an interim solution until I can get rid of PowerPath. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS with SAN Disks and mutipathing

2007-02-18 Thread Torrey McMahon
Richard Elling wrote: JS wrote: I'm using ZFS on both EMC and Pillar arrays with PowerPath and MPxIO, respectively. Both work fine - the only caveat is to drop your sd_queue to around 20 or so, otherwise you can run into an ugly display of bus resets. This is sd_max_throttle or ssd_max_throt

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS with SAN Disks and mutipathing

2007-02-18 Thread Richard Elling
JS wrote: I'm using ZFS on both EMC and Pillar arrays with PowerPath and MPxIO, respectively. Both work fine - the only caveat is to drop your sd_queue to around 20 or so, otherwise you can run into an ugly display of bus resets. This is sd_max_throttle or ssd_max_throttle. The problem is tha

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS with SAN Disks and mutipathing

2007-02-18 Thread Leon Koll
Have you tried PowerPath/EMC and MPxIO/Pillar on the same host? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS with SAN Disks and mutipathing

2007-02-17 Thread JS
I'm using ZFS on both EMC and Pillar arrays with PowerPath and MPxIO, respectively. Both work fine - the only caveat is to drop your sd_queue to around 20 or so, otherwise you can run into an ugly display of bus resets. This message posted from opensolaris.org