Anton Rang wrote:
On Dec 19, 2006, at 7:14 AM, Mike Seda wrote:
Anton B. Rang wrote:
I have a Sun SE 3511 array with 5 x 500 GB SATA-I disks in a RAID
5. This
2 TB logical drive is partitioned into 10 x 200GB slices. I gave 4
of these slices to a Solaris 10 U2 machine and added each of them
On 20-Dec-06, at 3:05 PM, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Hi Toby,
My understanding on the subject of SATA firmware reliability vs.
FC/SCSI is that its mostly related to SATA firmware being a lot
younger. ... Its probably unfair to expect defect rates out of SATA
firmware equivalent to firmware t
Hi Toby,
My understanding on the subject of SATA firmware reliability vs.
FC/SCSI is that its mostly related to SATA firmware being a lot
younger. The FC/SCSI firmware that's out there has been debugged for
10 years or so, so it has a lot fewer hiccoughs. Pillar Data Systems
told us once that the
On 19-Dec-06, at 2:42 PM, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
I do see this note in the 3511 documentation: "Note - Do not use a
Sun StorEdge 3511 SATA array to store single instances of data. It
is more suitable for use in configurations where the array has a
backup or archival role."
My unders
I do see this note in the 3511 documentation: "Note - Do not use a Sun StorEdge 3511
SATA array to store single instances of data. It is more suitable for use in
configurations where the array has a backup or archival role."
My understanding of this particular scare-tactic wording (its also in
On Dec 19, 2006, at 7:14 AM, Mike Seda wrote:
Anton B. Rang wrote:
I have a Sun SE 3511 array with 5 x 500 GB SATA-I disks in a RAID
5. This
2 TB logical drive is partitioned into 10 x 200GB slices. I gave
4 of these slices to a Solaris 10 U2 machine and added each of
them to a concat (non
Anton B. Rang wrote:
I have a Sun SE 3511 array with 5 x 500 GB SATA-I disks in a RAID 5. This
2 TB logical drive is partitioned into 10 x 200GB slices. I gave 4 of these slices to a
Solaris 10 U2 machine and added each of them to a concat (non-raid) zpool as listed below:
This is certain
> I have a Sun SE 3511 array with 5 x 500 GB SATA-I disks in a RAID 5. This
> 2 TB logical drive is partitioned into 10 x 200GB slices. I gave 4 of these
> slices to a
> Solaris 10 U2 machine and added each of them to a concat (non-raid) zpool as
> listed below:
This is certainly a supportable
