[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)

2007-06-26 Thread Joel Miller
I am pretty sure the T3/6120/6320 firmware does not support the SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE commands.. Off the top of my head, I do not know if that triggers any change in behavior on the Solaris side... The firmware does support the use of the FUA bit...which would potentially lead to similar flushing

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)

2007-04-23 Thread eric kustarz
On Apr 23, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Andy Lubel wrote: What I'm saying is ZFS doesn't play nice with NFS in all the scenarios I could think of: -Single second disk in a v210 (sun72g) write cache on and off = ~1/3 the performance of UFS when writing files using dd over an NFS mount using the s

RE: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)

2007-04-23 Thread Andy Lubel
- PAE Sent: Mon 4/23/2007 5:32 AM To: Leon Koll Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4) Leon Koll writes: > Welcome to the club, Andy... > > I tried several times to attract the attention of the community to the > dram

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)

2007-04-23 Thread Roch - PAE
Leon Koll writes: > Welcome to the club, Andy... > > I tried several times to attract the attention of the community to the > dramatic performance degradation (about 3 times) of NFZ/ZFS vs. ZFS/UFS > combination - without any result : href="http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messa

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)

2007-04-21 Thread Erblichs
or only Suns? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Erblichs > > Sent: Sun 4/22/2007 4:50 AM > > To: Leon Koll > > Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)

2007-04-21 Thread Spencer Shepler
Sent: Sun 4/22/2007 4:50 AM To: Leon Koll Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4) Leon Koll, As a knowldegeable outsider I can say something. The benchbark (SFS) page specifies NFSv3,v2 support, so I question whethe

RE: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)

2007-04-21 Thread Andy Lubel
@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4) Leon Koll, As a knowldegeable outsider I can say something. The benchbark (SFS) page specifies NFSv3,v2 support, so I question whether you ra n NFSv4. I would expect a major change in

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)

2007-04-21 Thread Erblichs
Leon Koll, As a knowldegeable outsider I can say something. The benchbark (SFS) page specifies NFSv3,v2 support, so I question whether you ra n NFSv4. I would expect a major change in performance just to version 4 NFS version and ZFS. The benchmark seems

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)

2007-04-20 Thread Leon Koll
Welcome to the club, Andy... I tried several times to attract the attention of the community to the dramatic performance degradation (about 3 times) of NFZ/ZFS vs. ZFS/UFS combination - without any result : http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=98592";>[1] , http://www.opensolari