On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 03:38:54PM -0700, Erik Trimble wrote:
> Joseph Mocker wrote:
> >Which brings me back to the point of file versioning. If an
> >implementation were based on something like when a file is open()ed
> >with write bits set. There would be no potential for broken files like
> >
Joseph Mocker wrote:
Which brings me back to the point of file versioning. If an
implementation were based on something like when a file is open()ed
with write bits set. There would be no potential for broken files like
this.
Also, it would seem that your statement about snapshots as being "w
Joseph Mocker wrote:
Which brings me back to the point of file versioning. If an
implementation were based on something like when a file is open()ed
with write bits set. There would be no potential for broken files like
this.
I'm showing my lack of knowledge on this one but I thought SAM-
Erik Trimble wrote:
Joseph Mocker wrote:
Erik Trimble wrote:
The developers can answer this definitively, but I believe the
answer to your questions is NO. That is, if there is anything in
the buffer waiting to be written when a snapshot request comes
along, the buffer is written out so
