Hello,
So I downloaded this module and integrated it into my samba 3.0.25 source
directory, reconfigured, and did a clean build and install. Problem is, it
doesn't appear that the zfsacl "plugin" was installed anywhere.
Forgive me if this is a newbie question, but how do I get smbd to use that
Leon Koll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > May be this link could help you?
> >
> > http://www.nabble.com/VFS-module-handling-ACL-on-ZFS-t3730348.html
> >
>
> Looks exactly what we need. It's strange it wasn't posted to zfs-discuss. SO
> many people were waiting for this code.
The NFSv4 ACLs are
> May be this link could help you?
>
> http://www.nabble.com/VFS-module-handling-ACL-on-ZFS-t3730348.html
>
Looks exactly what we need. It's strange it wasn't posted to zfs-discuss. SO
many people were waiting for this code.
Thanks, Dmitry.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
May be this link could help you?
http://www.nabble.com/VFS-module-handling-ACL-on-ZFS-t3730348.html
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-di
I hope it will be released soon. I asked Jiri about it and didn't get a
negative reply so I am optimistic now.
Steve
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
Hi Jiri,
> 3.0.25rc1 was released 2 days ago so the "final
> version" will be available soon. vfs_zfsacl.c module
> was tested soon so I think it is a question of 2-3
> weeks.
3 weeks after you posted this...can I ask you to update the community about the
availability of vfs_zfsacl.c module? Eve
Same here, needed ASAP. It's a shame Jiri can't release his work-in-progress
code, I've asked for a prerelease (even untested) version several times.
:(
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Have there been any new developments regarding the
> availability of vfs_zfsacl.c? Jeb, were you able to
> get a copy of Jiri's work-in-progress? I need this
> ASAP (as I'm sure most everyone watching this thread
> does)...
me too... A.S.A.P.!!!
[i]-- leon[/i]
This message posted from ope
Have there been any new developments regarding the availability of
vfs_zfsacl.c? Jeb, were you able to get a copy of Jiri's work-in-progress? I
need this ASAP (as I'm sure most everyone watching this thread does)...
Thank you for your help.
Roger Ripley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message post
Just so I'm clear:
You are waiting on the release of Samba 3.0.25 which allows vfs_* modules for
ACLS.
Then you will release vfs_zfsacl.c for Samba 3.0.25+ which would allow ACLS to
work?
Also I would love to beta test if needed -- I've been running Samba 3.0.25 from
subversion just to try an
3.0.25rc1 was released 2 days ago so the "final version" will be available
soon. vfs_zfsacl.c module was tested soon so I think it is a question of 2-3
weeks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensola
Hi Jiri,
>
> Currently the samba-3.0.25 will introduce the modular
> (.so) interface to plug the VFS modules handling the
> ACLs according the FS used.
Do you know - will the Samba/ZFS ACL be implemented in samba-3.0.26 ?
Thanks,
-- Leon
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Root cause is in the acl(2) call. ZFS implementation team does not implemented
backward compatibility of the SETACL/GETACL/GETACLCNT functions of this
syscall. Only the extended functions ACE_SETACL/ACE_GETACL/ACE_GETACLCNT are
implemented on ZFS. The old ones returns (errno == ENOTSUP) on ZFS (
New tidbit of information...
I have a user account USER belonging to two groups GROUP1 and GROUP2. GROUP1
is the primary group.
If the ZFS folder is owned by ROOT:GROUP1, I can create the file through Samba.
If the folder is owned by ROOT:GROUP2, the create fails. This same problem
occurs w
14 matches
Mail list logo
