Alan Romeril wrote:
PxFS performance improvements of the order of 5-6 times are possible
depending on the workload using Fastwrite option.
Fantastic! Has this been targetted at directory operations? We've
had issues with large directorys full of small files being very slow
to handle over PxFS.
PxFS performance improvements of the order of 5-6 times are possible depending
on the workload using Fastwrite option.
Fantastic! Has this been targetted at directory operations? We've had issues
with large directorys full of small files being very slow to handle over PxFS.
Are there plans fo
On 8/7/06, George Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leon,
Looking at the corefile doesn't really show much from the zfs side. It
looks like you were having problems with your san though:
/scsi_vhci/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ssd5) offline
/scsi_vhci/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ssd5) multipath status: failed, pa
Leon,
Looking at the corefile doesn't really show much from the zfs side. It
looks like you were having problems with your san though:
/scsi_vhci/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ssd5) offline
/scsi_vhci/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ssd5) multipath status: failed, path
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],70/SUNW,[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 8/7/06, William D. Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If this is reproducible, can you force a panic so it can be analyzed?
The core files and explorer output are here:
http://napobo3.lk.net/vinc/
The core files were created after the box was hungbreak to OBP...sync
If this is reproducible, can you force a panic so it can be analyzed?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
