On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 02:47:19AM -0700, Louwtjie Burger wrote:
> Are there any consideration given to this feature...?
Yes, this is on our radar. We have some ideas about how to implement
it, but it will probably be at least 6 months until it is ready. We
have several higher-priority tasks to
Hi there
Are there any consideration given to this feature...?
I would also agree that this will not only be a "testing" feature, but will
find it's way into production.
It would probably work on the same princaple of swap -a and swap -d ;) Just a
little bit more complex.
This message post
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 10:29:49AM -0700, Brad Plecs wrote:
>
> You *can* replace individual devices in the vdev, but I haven't tested
> whether or
> not the raidz grows to use the full size of the disks once I replace all the
> 36 GB drives
> with 73 GB drives. I suspect not.
Actually, it d
> Yeah, I ran into that in my testing, too. I suspect
> it's something
> that will come up in testing a LOT more than in real
> production use.
I disagree. I can see lots of situations where you want to attach new storage
and
remove or retire old storage from an existing pool. It would be grea
