Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re[2]: RAIDZ2 vs. ZFS RAID-10

2007-01-04 Thread Anton Rang
On Jan 4, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Roch - PAE wrote: All filesystems will incur a read-modify-write when application is updating portion of a block. For most Solaris file systems it is the page size, rather than the block size, that affects read-modify-write; hence 8K (SPARC) or 4K (x86

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re[2]: RAIDZ2 vs. ZFS RAID-10

2007-01-04 Thread Roch - PAE
Anton B. Rang writes: > >> In our recent experience RAID-5 due to the 2 reads, a XOR calc and a > >> write op per write instruction is usually much slower than RAID-10 > >> (two write ops). Any advice is greatly appreciated. > > > > RAIDZ and RAIDZ2 does not suffer from this malady (the RAID

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re[2]: RAIDZ2 vs. ZFS RAID-10

2007-01-03 Thread Jason J. W. Williams
Hi Anton, Thank you for the information. That is exactly our scenario. We're 70% write heavy, and given the nature of the workload, our typical writes are 10-20K. Again the information is much appreciated. Best Regards, Jason On 1/3/07, Anton B. Rang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In our recent

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re[2]: RAIDZ2 vs. ZFS RAID-10

2007-01-03 Thread Anton B. Rang
>> In our recent experience RAID-5 due to the 2 reads, a XOR calc and a >> write op per write instruction is usually much slower than RAID-10 >> (two write ops). Any advice is greatly appreciated. > > RAIDZ and RAIDZ2 does not suffer from this malady (the RAID5 write hole). 1. This isn't the "wr