> Bryan,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion. I am looking at this as
> more of a DR solution. However, I might be able to
> use your method if my data can be a little old.
> Perhaps this way I could sync the data nightly with a
> remote site to make sure that I am no more than 24
> hours behind in the
Folks,
We're following up with EMC on this. We'll post something on the alias
when we get it.
Please note that EMC would probably never say anything about
OpenSolaris, but they'll talk about Solaris ZFS
Bev.
Torrey McMahon wrote:
Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
For whatever reason EMC notes
Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
For whatever reason EMC notes (on PowerLink) suggest that ZFS is not supported
on their arrays. If one is going to use a ZFS filesystem on top of a EMC array
be warned about support issues.
They should have fixed that in their matrices. It should say something
like,
Hello Anantha,
Wednesday, May 9, 2007, 4:45:10 PM, you wrote:
ANS> For whatever reason EMC notes (on PowerLink) suggest that ZFS is
ANS> not supported on their arrays. If one is going to use a ZFS
ANS> filesystem on top of a EMC array be warned about support issues.
Nope. For a couple of months
For whatever reason EMC notes (on PowerLink) suggest that ZFS is not supported
on their arrays. If one is going to use a ZFS filesystem on top of a EMC array
be warned about support issues.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss ma
Bryan,
Thanks for your suggestion. I am looking at this as more of a DR solution.
However, I might be able to use your method if my data can be a little old.
Perhaps this way I could sync the data nightly with a remote site to make sure
that I am no more than 24 hours behind in the case of a di
Torrey,
Yes. I am used to dealing with the array based software you mention in your
post as well as filesystem based products like AVS and Veritas Volume
Replicator.
After reading some documentation send to me by Cindy Swearingen (Thanks Cindy!)
about zfs send and receive it seems that it is
I guess when we are defining a mirror, are you talking about a synchronous
mirror or an asynchronous mirror?
As stated earlier, if you are looking for an asynchronous mirror and do not
want to use AVS, you can use zfs send and receive and craft a fairly simple
script that runs constantly and u
Aaron Newcomb wrote:
Terry,
Yes. AVS is pretty expensive. If ZFS did this out of the box it would be a huge
differentiator. I know ZFS does snapshots today, but if we could extend this
functionality to work across distance then we would have something that could
compete with expensive solutio
Terry,
Yes. AVS is pretty expensive. If ZFS did this out of the box it would be a huge
differentiator. I know ZFS does snapshots today, but if we could extend this
functionality to work across distance then we would have something that could
compete with expensive solutions from EMC, HP, IBM, N
10 matches
Mail list logo
