> I would much prefer to do
>
> for snap in $(zfs list -t snapshot -r foo/bar )
> do
> zfs destroy -t snapshot $snap
> do
>
> the not have the -t. Especially the further away the destroy is from the
> generation of the list. The extra -t would be belt and braces but that is
> how I like
>
> On the other hand personally I just don't see the
> need for this since
> the @ char isn't special to the shell so I don't see
> where the original
> problem came from.
It is the combination of the fear of doing something bad and the the
consequence of doing that something bad that make pe
