On 4/11/07, Marco van Lienen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A colleague at work and I have followed the same steps, included
running a digest on the /test/file, on a SXCE:61 build today and
can confirm the exact same, and disturbing?, result. My colleague
mentioned to me he has witnessed the same '
ugh, thanks for exploring this and isolating the problem. We will look
into what is going on (wrong) here. I have filed bug:
6545015 RAID-Z resilver broken
to track this problem.
-Mark
Marco van Lienen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:05:18PM -0500, in a galaxy far far away, Chris
Csanady
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:05:18PM -0500, in a galaxy far far away, Chris
Csanady said:
> In a recent message, I detailed the excessive checksum errors that
> occurred after replacing a disk. It seems that after a resilver
> completes, it leaves a large number of blocks in the pool which fail
> t
In a recent message, I detailed the excessive checksum errors that
occurred after replacing a disk. It seems that after a resilver
completes, it leaves a large number of blocks in the pool which fail
to checksum properly. Afterward, it is necessary to scrub the pool in
order to correct these err
