On Fri, 29 May 2009, cindy.swearin...@sun.com wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> Yes, your zpool syntax is correct.
>
> I just tested what I think is your final
> configuration.
Great (gotta love ZFS)!
Many thanks,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.li
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Dennis! Good to hear from you! I hope things are well in
Dennis-land.
> so yeah, you have it.
>
> Want to go for bonus points? Try to read into that man page to figure out
> how to add a hot spare *after* you are all mirrored up.
Excellent! We will b
Hi Rich,
Yes, your zpool syntax is correct.
I just tested what I think is your final
configuration.
Cindy
# zpool create dpool c1t0d0 c1t1d0 c1t2d0
# zpool attach dpool c1t1d0 c1t3d0
# zpool attach dpool c1t0d0 c1t4d0
# zpool attach dpool c1t2d0 c1t5d0
# zpool status dpool
pool: dpool
state
>
> zpool create dpool c1t0d0 c1t1d0 c1t2d0
yep
> And then later, when the other cable is installed:
>
> zpool attach dpool c1t0d0 c2t0d0
> zpool attach dpool c1t1d0 c2t1d0
> zpool attach dpool c1t2d0 c2t2d0
That is sort of the way I do things also :
# zpool status
pool: fibre0
state: ONLIN
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Rich Teer wrote:
zpool attach dpool c1t0d0 c2t0d0
zpool attach dpool c1t1d0 c2t1d0
zpool attach dpool c1t2d0 c2t2d0
These should all be "zpool add dpool mirror {disk1} {disk2}", but yes. I
recommend trying this out using files instead of disks beforehand so you
get a fe
Hi all,
I have a D1000 storage array that's set up in a split bus config.
For various reason we only have access to one SCSI cable for the
time being, but the intent is to set up the array as ZFS mirrored
devices. That is, the intent is that we'll have a ZFS pool created
from 3 pairs of mirrored
