Re: [zfs-discuss] Question on ZFS iSCSI

2011-06-01 Thread Jim Klimov
> > Disk /dev/zvol/rdsk/pool/dcpool: 4295GB > > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > > > Just to check, did you already try: > > zpool import -d /dev/zvol/rdsk/pool/ poolname > Thanks for the sugestion. As a matter of fact, I did not try that. But it hasn't helped (possibly tue to parti

Re: [zfs-discuss] Question on ZFS iSCSI

2011-06-01 Thread a . smith
Disk /dev/zvol/rdsk/pool/dcpool: 4295GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Just to check, did you already try: zpool import -d /dev/zvol/rdsk/pool/ poolname ? thanks Andy. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://m

Re: [zfs-discuss] Question on ZFS iSCSI

2011-05-31 Thread Jim Klimov
> The volume is exported as whole disk. When given whole disk, zpool > creates GPT partition table by default. You need to pass the partition > (not the disk) to zdb. Yes, that is what seems to be the problem. However, for the zfs volumes (/dev/zvol/rdsk/pool/dcpool) there seems to be no concept o

Re: [zfs-discuss] Question on ZFS iSCSI

2011-05-31 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Jim Klimov wrote: > However it seems that there may be some extra data beside the zfs > pool in the actual volume (I'd at least expect an MBR or GPT, and > maybe some iSCSI service data as an overhead). One way or another, > the "dcpool" can not be found in the phy

[zfs-discuss] Question on ZFS iSCSI

2011-05-31 Thread Jim Klimov
I have a oi_148a test box with a pool on physical HDDs, a volume in this pool shared over iSCSI with explicit commands (sbdadm and such), and this iSCSI target is initiated by the same box. In the resulting iSCSI device I have another ZFS pool "dcpool". Recently I found the iSCSI part to be a pote