Ahh.
what a relief, knowing the baby data could be ok... best wishes!
I am going for some seafood dinner now.
cheers,
z
- Original Message -
From: "Philipp Haußleiter"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Problem importing deg
So
after a short time of silence
i took some hours to have a look over the plain disks...
So first of all:
The Data seems still to be there!!! :-) i can identify it by some file
headers.
So i am currently doing some testing within a VMSetup.
After that i will try to scan my two
Hi,
Eeemmm, i think its safe to say your zpool and its data are gone for ever.
Use the Samsung disk checker boot CD, and see if it can fix your faulty disk.
Then connect all 3 drives to your system and use raidz. Your data will then be
well protected.
Brian,
--
This message posted from opensol
It seems that my devices have several settings of pools :-(
zdb -l /dev/rdsk/c0t5d0
tells me
LABEL 0
failed to unpack label 0
LABEL 1
thx for your suggestions couper88, but this did not help :-/.
I tried the lastes live-cd of 2008.11
and got new information:
a zpool import shows me now:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# zpool import
pool: tank
id: 1717390511944489
state: UNAVAIL
status: One or more devices contains corrupted da
Hi,
Attach both original drives to the system, the faulty one may only have had a
few check sum errors.
zpool status -vshould hopefully show your data pool. Provided you have not
started to replaced the faulty drive yet. If it don't see the pool, zpool
export then zpool import and hope
i found some tasks to do, to get more information about the problem.
zpool import tank tells me:
cannot import 'tank': pool may be in use from other system
use '-f' to import anyway
zpool import -f tank
cannot import 'tank': no such pool or dataset
using zpool import
fmdump -eV gives me
N
zdb on the two devices told me:
zdb -l /dev/rdsk/c0t2d0
LABEL 0
failed to unpack label 0
LABEL 1
failed to unpack lab
i make the second disk of the pool working again...
any change to restore the metadata of the pool?
tried to figure something out from the head of the device (dd the first 100megs
to a file), but found nothing helpful :-/.
tried a
zpool -D tank
what information should i give?
--
This message
>
> On 29 Nov 2008, at 09:35, Philipp Haußleiter wrote:
>
> > Hello...
> >
> > i have somehow a strange problem.
> > I build a normal zfs pool of two disks (jbod) and
> set some folders
> > to copies=2
>
> Mirrored disks?
No... just a stripe of disks. But i set some zfs volumes to store the d
Is this a mirrored pool or a striped one? If it was mirrored, you can just
replace the faulty drive and it should rebuild. If it was just striped I don't
know where you stand. Copies=2 isn't a replacement for redundancy, I don't
know if that pool is going to be in a usable state.
We really n
On 29 Nov 2008, at 09:35, Philipp Haußleiter wrote:
> Hello...
>
> i have somehow a strange problem.
> I build a normal zfs pool of two disks (jbod) and set some folders
> to copies=2
Mirrored disks?
> Yesterday one of the disks failed and so the zpool status changed to:
>
>> pool: tank
>> st
Hello...
i have somehow a strange problem.
I build a normal zfs pool of two disks (jbod) and set some folders to copies=2
Yesterday one of the disks failed and so the zpool status changed to:
> pool: tank
> state: DEGRADED
> status: One or more devices could not be opened. Sufficient replicas ex
13 matches
Mail list logo
