Re: [zfs-discuss] Priorities (moving forums...)

2006-06-23 Thread Erik Trimble
Please refer all followups to this thread over to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 11:27 -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote: > * Erik Trimble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-23 11:15]: > > It is a good start (yes, I know it's an interface to Bugster, just as > > the Java one I pointed out i

Re: [zfs-discuss] Priorities

2006-06-23 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Dale Ghent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-23 11:28]: > On Jun 23, 2006, at 1:09 PM, eric kustarz wrote: > Third, much of end-to-end bug servicing from a non-Sun perspective is > still an uphill battle, from acronyms and terms used to policies and > coordination of work, e.g. "Is someone in Sun

Re: [zfs-discuss] Priorities

2006-06-23 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 02:20:54PM -0400, Dale Ghent wrote: > Second, while there is a way for Joe Random to submit a bug, there is > zero way for Joe Random to interact with a bug. No voting to bump or > drop a priority, no easy way to find hot topic bugs, no way to add > one's own notes to

Re: [zfs-discuss] Priorities

2006-06-23 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Erik Trimble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-23 11:15]: > It is a good start (yes, I know it's an interface to Bugster, just as > the Java one I pointed out is too - in fact, it's probably the same > code). And, I'm certainly not complaining about how well people have > been taking to and addressin

Re: [zfs-discuss] Priorities

2006-06-23 Thread Dale Ghent
On Jun 23, 2006, at 1:09 PM, eric kustarz wrote: How about it folks - would it be a good idea for me to explore what it takes to get such a bug/RFE setup implemented for the ZFS community on OpenSolaris.org? what's wrong with http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/index.jsp for findin

Re: [zfs-discuss] Priorities

2006-06-23 Thread Erik Trimble
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 10:09 -0700, eric kustarz wrote: > > How about it folks - would it be a good idea for me to explore what it > > takes to get such a bug/RFE setup implemented for the ZFS community on > > OpenSolaris.org? > > > what's wrong with http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/index

Re: [zfs-discuss] Priorities

2006-06-23 Thread Mike Kupfer
[resend with corrected cc list -mdk] > "EK" == eric kustarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: EK> what's wrong with http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/index.jsp EK> for finding bugs? Unless they've fixed it recently, the "keywords" search doesn't actually check against the Bugster keywords fi

Re: [zfs-discuss] Priorities

2006-06-23 Thread Mike Kupfer
> "EK" == eric kustarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: EK> what's wrong with http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/index.jsp EK> for finding bugs? Unless they've fixed it recently, the "keywords" search doesn't actually check against the Bugster keywords field. And the information presented is

Re: [zfs-discuss] Priorities

2006-06-23 Thread eric kustarz
How about it folks - would it be a good idea for me to explore what it takes to get such a bug/RFE setup implemented for the ZFS community on OpenSolaris.org? what's wrong with http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/index.jsp for finding bugs? i think we've been really good about taking

[zfs-discuss] Priorities (was: ZFS on 32bit x86)

2006-06-23 Thread Erik Trimble
Darren J Moffat wrote: This is an @opensolaris.org alias it is about working together as a community and identifying problems and discovering solutions. I don't think it is at all appropriate to bring up Sun business choices here. Where that is appropriate is when Sun employees need to justify