Re: [zfs-discuss] Peculiar behavior of snapshot after zfs receive

2007-02-09 Thread Trevor Watson
Thanks Robert, that did the trick for me! Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello Wade, Thursday, February 8, 2007, 8:00:40 PM, you wrote: TW> Am I using send/recv incorrectly or is there something else going on here that TW> I am missing? It's a known bug. umount and rollback file system on host

Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Peculiar behavior of snapshot after zfs receive

2007-02-08 Thread Wade . Stuart
> Hello Wade, > > Thursday, February 8, 2007, 8:00:40 PM, you wrote: > > > > > >> > >> TW> Am I using send/recv incorrectly or is there something else > >> going on here that > >> TW> I am missing? > >> > >> > >> It's a known bug. > >> > >> umount and rollback file system on host 2. You should

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Peculiar behavior of snapshot after zfs receive

2007-02-08 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Wade, Thursday, February 8, 2007, 8:00:40 PM, you wrote: >> >> TW> Am I using send/recv incorrectly or is there something else >> going on here that >> TW> I am missing? >> >> >> It's a known bug. >> >> umount and rollback file system on host 2. You should see 0 used space >> on a snapsh

Re: [zfs-discuss] Peculiar behavior of snapshot after zfs receive

2007-02-08 Thread Wade . Stuart
> > TW> Am I using send/recv incorrectly or is there something else > going on here that > TW> I am missing? > > > It's a known bug. > > umount and rollback file system on host 2. You should see 0 used space > on a snapshot and then it should work. Bug ID? Is it related to atime changes? > >