On Jan 30, 2011, at 6:03 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Stuart Anderson wrote:
>> On Jan 30, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2011, at 12:21 PM, stuart anderson wrote:
>>>
Is it possible to partition the global setting for the maximum ARC
On Jan 30, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
>
>> On Jan 30, 2011, at 12:21 PM, stuart anderson wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible to partition the global setting for the maximum ARC size
>>> with finer grained controls? Ideally, I would like
On Jan 30, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2011, at 12:21 PM, stuart anderson wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to partition the global setting for the maximum ARC size
>> with finer grained controls? Ideally, I would like to do this on a per
>> zvol basis but a setting per zpool w
On Jan 30, 2011, at 12:21 PM, stuart anderson wrote:
> Is it possible to partition the global setting for the maximum ARC size
> with finer grained controls? Ideally, I would like to do this on a per
> zvol basis but a setting per zpool would be interesting as well?
While perhaps not perfect, see
- Original Message -
> Is it possible to partition the global setting for the maximum ARC
> size
> with finer grained controls? Ideally, I would like to do this on a per
> zvol basis but a setting per zpool would be interesting as well?
>
> The use case is to prioritize which zvol devices
Is it possible to partition the global setting for the maximum ARC size
with finer grained controls? Ideally, I would like to do this on a per
zvol basis but a setting per zpool would be interesting as well?
The use case is to prioritize which zvol devices should be fully cached
in DRAM on a serve
