Richard Elling schrieb:
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 23:09 +0200, Daniel Rock wrote:
(*) maxphys = 8388608
Pedantically, because ZFS does 128kByte I/Os. Setting maxphys >
128kBytes won't make any difference.
I know, but with the default maxphys value of 56kByte on x86 a 128kByte
request will be s
Bart Smaalders schrieb:
How big is the database?
After all the data has been loaded, all datafiles together 2.8GB, SGA 320MB.
But I don't think size matters on this problem, since you can already see
during the catalog creation phase that UFS is 2x faster.
Since oracle writes in small blo
Daniel Rock wrote:
Hi,
I'm preparing a personal TPC-H benchmark. The goal is not to measure or
optimize the database performance, but to compare ZFS to UFS in similar
configurations.
At the moment I'm preparing the tests at home. The test setup is as
follows:
. Solaris snv_37
. 2 x AMD Opteron
Hi,
I'm preparing a personal TPC-H benchmark. The goal is not to measure or
optimize the database performance, but to compare ZFS to UFS in similar
configurations.
At the moment I'm preparing the tests at home. The test setup is as
follows:
. Solaris snv_37
. 2 x AMD Opteron 252
. 4 GB RAM
. 2 x
