On 23-Jun-08, at 6:59 PM, Miles Nordin wrote:
>> ... A proper
> DBMS (anything except MySQL)
Perhaps you mean MyISAM. MySQL's InnoDB engine offers ACID.
--Toby
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/m
Richard Elling wrote:
> Hacked non-COW zvol? Since COW occurs at the DMU layer,
> below ZPL or ZVol, I don't see how to bypass it. AFAIK,
> the trick to using ZVols for swap was to just fix some bugs
> in ZFS and rewrite the pertinent parts of the installer(s).
Swap just uses a normal ZVOL, whi
Miles Nordin wrote:
>> "re" == Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "kb" == Keith Bierman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>
> re> the disk lies about the persistence of the data. ZFS knows
> re> disks lie, so it sends sync commands when necessary
>
> (1) i
> "re" == Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "kb" == Keith Bierman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
re> the disk lies about the persistence of the data. ZFS knows
re> disks lie, so it sends sync commands when necessary
(1) i don't think ``lie'' is a correct characerization g
Miles Nordin wrote:
>> "mo" == Mertol Ozyoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>
> mo> One of our customer is suffered from FS being corrupted after
> mo> an unattanded shutdonw due to power problem.
>
> mo> They want to switch to ZFS.
>
> mo> From what I read on,
On Jun 23, 2008, at 11:36 AM, Miles Nordin wrote:
> unplanned power outage that
> happens after fsync returns
Aye, but isn't that the real rub ... when the power fails after the
write but *before* the fsync has occurred...
--
Keith H. Bierman [EMAIL PROTECTED] | AIM kbiermank
5430 Na
> "mo" == Mertol Ozyoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mo> One of our customer is suffered from FS being corrupted after
mo> an unattanded shutdonw due to power problem.
mo> They want to switch to ZFS.
mo> From what I read on, ZFS will most probably not be corrupted
mo> fro
Mertol Ozyoney wrote:
>
> Hi All ;
>
> One of our customer is suffered from FS being corrupted after an
> unattanded shutdonw due to power problem.
>
> They want to switch to ZFS.
>
> From what I read on, ZFS will most probably not be corrupted from the
> same event. But I am not sure how will Or
>From my usage, the first question you should ask your customer is how much
of a performance hit they can spare when switching to ZFS for Oracle. I've
done lots of tweaking (following threads I've read on the mailing list), but
I still can't seem to get enough performance out of any databases on ZF
Hi All ;
One of our customer is suffered from FS being corrupted after an unattanded
shutdonw due to power problem.
They want to switch to ZFS.
>From what I read on, ZFS will most probably not be corrupted from the same
event. But I am not sure how will Oracle be affected from a sudden p
On Jul 26, 2007, at 10:00 AM, gerald anderson wrote:
> Customer question:
>
> Oracle 10
>
> Customer has a 6540 with 4 trays of 300G 10k drives. The raid sets
> are 3 + 1
>
> vertically stripped on the 4 trays. Two 400G volumes are created on
> each
>
> raid set. Would it be best to put all o
Customer question:
Oracle 10
Customer has a 6540 with 4 trays of 300G 10k drives. The raid sets are 3 + 1
vertically stripped on the 4 trays. Two 400G volumes are created on each
raid set. Would it be best to put all of the volumes in one Zpool or should
we create multiple Zpools to better manage
12 matches
Mail list logo
