Re: [zfs-discuss] More performance questions [on zfs over nfs]

2010-02-23 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam writes: > [Note: This is a repost of question posted about 1.5 days ago that > has never appeared on the group.. at least not on my server (gmane). > Sorry if it ends up being a double whammy] Apparently I missed two informative answers by: Henrik J. Bob F. Thanks for the input...

[zfs-discuss] More performance questions [on zfs over nfs]

2010-02-22 Thread Harry Putnam
[Note: This is a repost of question posted about 1.5 days ago that has never appeared on the group.. at least not on my server (gmane). Sorry if it ends up being a double whammy] Working from a remote linux machine on a zfs fs that is an nfs mounted share (set for nfs availability on zfs server, m

Re: [zfs-discuss] More performance questions [on zfs over nfs]

2010-02-21 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Henrik Johansson wrote: You will not see the on disk size of the file with du before the transaction group have been committed which can take up to 30 seconds. ZFS does not even know how much space it will consume before writing out the data to disks since compression might

Re: [zfs-discuss] More performance questions [on zfs over nfs]

2010-02-21 Thread Henrik Johansson
On Feb 21, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: > > Working from a remote linux machine on a zfs fs that is an nfs mounted > share (set for nfs availability on zfs server, mounted nfs on linux); > I've been noticing a certain kind of sloth when messing with files. > > What I see: After writin

[zfs-discuss] More performance questions [on zfs over nfs]

2010-02-21 Thread Harry Putnam
Working from a remote linux machine on a zfs fs that is an nfs mounted share (set for nfs availability on zfs server, mounted nfs on linux); I've been noticing a certain kind of sloth when messing with files. What I see: After writing a file it seems to take the fs too long to be able to display