Re: [zfs-discuss] Monitoring my disk activity

2010-03-08 Thread Richard Elling
On Mar 8, 2010, at 5:11 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> It all depends on how they are connecting to the storage. iSCSI, CIFS, >> NFS, >> database, rsync, ...? >> >> The reason I say this is because ZFS will coalesce writes, so just >> looking at >> iostat data (ops versus size) will not be appr

Re: [zfs-discuss] Monitoring my disk activity

2010-03-08 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> It all depends on how they are connecting to the storage. iSCSI, CIFS, > NFS, > database, rsync, ...? > > The reason I say this is because ZFS will coalesce writes, so just > looking at > iostat data (ops versus size) will not be appropriate. You need to > look at the > data flowing between ZF

Re: [zfs-discuss] Monitoring my disk activity

2010-03-06 Thread Richard Elling
On Mar 6, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > Recently, I’m benchmarking all kinds of stuff on my systems. And one > question I can’t intelligently answer is what blocksize I should use in these > tests. > > I assume there is something which monitors present disk activity, that I > c

[zfs-discuss] Monitoring my disk activity

2010-03-06 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
Recently, I'm benchmarking all kinds of stuff on my systems. And one question I can't intelligently answer is what blocksize I should use in these tests. I assume there is something which monitors present disk activity, that I could run on my production servers, to give me some statistics of t