On 07 June, 2008 - Fu Leow sent me these 1,1K bytes:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Mario Goebbels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> c1t5d0 was part of a mirror but with c1t4d0 removed it now appears as
> >> a single drive. Is there a way to recover from this by recreating the
> >> mirror with c1
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Mario Goebbels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> c1t5d0 was part of a mirror but with c1t4d0 removed it now appears as
>> a single drive. Is there a way to recover from this by recreating the
>> mirror with c1t4d0?
>
> Detaching a drive from a two-way mirror effectively
> c1t5d0 was part of a mirror but with c1t4d0 removed it now appears as
> a single drive. Is there a way to recover from this by recreating the
> mirror with c1t4d0?
Detaching a drive from a two-way mirror effectively breaks it up and
turns it into a single drive. That's normal. Just attach it bac
On 07 June, 2008 - Fu Leow sent me these 2,0K bytes:
> Hi,
>
> I had a plan to set up a zfs pool with different raid levels but I ran
> into an issue based on some testing I've done in a VM. I have 3x 750
> GB hard drives and 2x 320 GB hard drives available, and I want to set
> up a RAIDZ for the
Hi,
I had a plan to set up a zfs pool with different raid levels but I ran
into an issue based on some testing I've done in a VM. I have 3x 750
GB hard drives and 2x 320 GB hard drives available, and I want to set
up a RAIDZ for the 750 GB and mirror for the 320 GB and add it all to
the same pool.
