Re: [zfs-discuss] Max_Payload_Size

2008-04-05 Thread Brandon High
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Marc Bevand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > with him, and I noticed that there are BIOS settings for the pcie max > > payload size. The default value is 4096 bytes. > > I noticed. But it looks like this setting has no effect on anything > whatsoever. My guess

Re: [zfs-discuss] Max_Payload_Size

2008-04-02 Thread Brandon High
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Marc Bevand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think I'll go back to the 128-byte setting. I wouldn't want to > see errors happening under heavy usage even though my stress > tests were all successful (aggregate data rate of 610 MB/s > generated by reading the disks

Re: [zfs-discuss] Max_Payload_Size

2008-03-15 Thread Marc Bevand
Anton B. Rang acm.org> writes: > Looking at the AMD 690 series manual (well, the family > register guide), the max payload size value is deliberately > set to 0 to indicate that the chip only supports 128-byte > transfers. There is a bit in another register which can be > set to ignore max-payload

Re: [zfs-discuss] Max_Payload_Size (was Re: 7-disk raidz achieves 430 MB/s reads and...)

2008-03-14 Thread Marc Bevand
Anton B. Rang acm.org> writes: > > Be careful of changing the Max_Payload_Size parameter. It needs to match, > and be supported, between all PCI-E components which might communicate with > each other. You can tell what values are supported by reading the Device > Capabilities Register and checkin

[zfs-discuss] Max_Payload_Size (was Re: 7-disk raidz achieves 430 MB/s reads and...)

2008-03-13 Thread Anton B. Rang
Be careful of changing the Max_Payload_Size parameter. It needs to match, and be supported, between all PCI-E components which might communicate with each other. You can tell what values are supported by reading the Device Capabilities Register and checking the Max_Payload_Size Supported bits.