On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>
> Ok, but that leaves the question what a better value would be. I gather
> that HFS+ operates in terms of 512-byte sectors but larger allocation units;
> however, unless those allocation units are a power of two between 512 and 128k
> inclusive _a
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> >
> > Reasonable enough guess, but no, no compression,
> nothing like that;
> > nor am I running anything particularly demanding
> most of the time.
> >
> > I did have the volblocksize set down to 512 for
> that volume, since I thought
> > that fo
