On Fri, February 19, 2010 16:21, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:15:17PM -0600, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, February 19, 2010 13:09, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>>
>> > Anybody know what the proper geometry is for a WD1600BEKT-6-1A13?
>> It's
>> > not even in the data s
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:15:17PM -0600, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>
> On Fri, February 19, 2010 13:09, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>
> > Anybody know what the proper geometry is for a WD1600BEKT-6-1A13? It's
> > not even in the data sheets any more!
any such geometry has been entirely fictitious
On Fri, February 19, 2010 13:09, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Anybody know what the proper geometry is for a WD1600BEKT-6-1A13? It's
> not even in the data sheets any more!
One further point -- I can't seem to enter the geometry the second disk
has manually for the first; when I enter 152615 for
I've somehow got the geometry of the new disks set wrong, even though one
of them works. The geometry of the two is set the same. One of them has
suitable partitions, and works. One can't be set for suitable partitions
since they don't fit (even though the other one has them). It can't be
atta
