On Wed, August 4, 2010 12:25, valrh...@gmail.com wrote:
> Actually, no. I could care less about incrementals, and multivolume
> handling. My purpose is to have occasional, long-term archival backup of
> big experimental data sets. The challenge is keeping everything organized,
> and readable severa
Actually, no. I could care less about incrementals, and multivolume handling.
My purpose is to have occasional, long-term archival backup of big experimental
data sets. The challenge is keeping everything organized, and readable several
years later, where I only need to recall a small subset of
"valrh...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Has anyone looked into the new LTFS on LTO-5 for tape backups? Any idea how
> this would work with ZFS? I'm presuming ZFS send / receive are not going to
> work. But it seems rather appealing to have the metadata properly with the
> data, and being able to browse
Has anyone looked into the new LTFS on LTO-5 for tape backups? Any idea how
this would work with ZFS? I'm presuming ZFS send / receive are not going to
work. But it seems rather appealing to have the metadata properly with the
data, and being able to browse files directly instead of having to re
