Re: [zfs-discuss] Hung Hot Spare

2011-03-03 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> > Just a shot in the dark, but could this possibly be related to my > > issue as posted with the subject "Nasty zfs issue"? > > I do not think they are directly related. I have seen some odd > behavior when I replace a failed drive before the resilver completes, > but nothing as dramatic as what

Re: [zfs-discuss] Hung Hot Spare

2011-03-03 Thread Paul Kraus
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > Just a shot in the dark, but could this possibly be related to my issue as > posted with the subject "Nasty zfs issue"? I do not think they are directly related. I have seen some odd behavior when I replace a failed drive before

Re: [zfs-discuss] Hung Hot Spare

2011-03-03 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
Just a shot in the dark, but could this possibly be related to my issue as posted with the subject "Nasty zfs issue"? roy - Original Message - > Apologies in advance as this is a Solaris 10 question and not an > OpenSolaris issue (well, OK, it *may* also be an OpenSolaris issue). > Syste

Re: [zfs-discuss] Hung Hot Spare

2011-03-03 Thread Paul Kraus
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Cindy Swearingen wrote: > I've seen some spare stickiness too and its generally when I'm trying to > simulate a drive failure (like you are below) without actually > physically replacing the device. > > If I actually physically replace the failed drive, the spare i

Re: [zfs-discuss] Hung Hot Spare

2011-03-03 Thread Paul Kraus
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Richard Elling wrote: >> 1) zpool with multiple vdevs and hot spares >> 2) multiple drive failures at once > > In my experience, hot spares do not help with the case where the failures > are not explicitly drive failures. In those cases where I see multiple > fai

Re: [zfs-discuss] Hung Hot Spare

2011-03-03 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Hi Paul, I've seen some spare stickiness too and its generally when I'm trying to simulate a drive failure (like you are below) without actually physically replacing the device. If I actually physically replace the failed drive, the spare is detached automatically after the new device is resilve

Re: [zfs-discuss] Hung Hot Spare

2011-03-03 Thread Richard Elling
On Mar 3, 2011, at 6:45 AM, Paul Kraus wrote: > Apologies in advance as this is a Solaris 10 question and not an > OpenSolaris issue (well, OK, it *may* also be an OpenSolaris issue). > System is a T2000 running Solaris 10U9 with latest ZFS patches (zpool > version 22). Storage is a pile of J4400

[zfs-discuss] Hung Hot Spare

2011-03-03 Thread Paul Kraus
Apologies in advance as this is a Solaris 10 question and not an OpenSolaris issue (well, OK, it *may* also be an OpenSolaris issue). System is a T2000 running Solaris 10U9 with latest ZFS patches (zpool version 22). Storage is a pile of J4400 (5 of them). I have run into what appears to be (Sun)