> > Just a shot in the dark, but could this possibly be related to my
> > issue as posted with the subject "Nasty zfs issue"?
>
> I do not think they are directly related. I have seen some odd
> behavior when I replace a failed drive before the resilver completes,
> but nothing as dramatic as what
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Just a shot in the dark, but could this possibly be related to my issue as
> posted with the subject "Nasty zfs issue"?
I do not think they are directly related. I have seen some odd
behavior when I replace a failed drive before
Just a shot in the dark, but could this possibly be related to my issue as
posted with the subject "Nasty zfs issue"?
roy
- Original Message -
> Apologies in advance as this is a Solaris 10 question and not an
> OpenSolaris issue (well, OK, it *may* also be an OpenSolaris issue).
> Syste
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Cindy Swearingen
wrote:
> I've seen some spare stickiness too and its generally when I'm trying to
> simulate a drive failure (like you are below) without actually
> physically replacing the device.
>
> If I actually physically replace the failed drive, the spare i
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Richard Elling
wrote:
>> 1) zpool with multiple vdevs and hot spares
>> 2) multiple drive failures at once
>
> In my experience, hot spares do not help with the case where the failures
> are not explicitly drive failures. In those cases where I see multiple
> fai
Hi Paul,
I've seen some spare stickiness too and its generally when I'm trying to
simulate a drive failure (like you are below) without actually
physically replacing the device.
If I actually physically replace the failed drive, the spare is
detached automatically after the new device is resilve
On Mar 3, 2011, at 6:45 AM, Paul Kraus wrote:
> Apologies in advance as this is a Solaris 10 question and not an
> OpenSolaris issue (well, OK, it *may* also be an OpenSolaris issue).
> System is a T2000 running Solaris 10U9 with latest ZFS patches (zpool
> version 22). Storage is a pile of J4400
Apologies in advance as this is a Solaris 10 question and not an
OpenSolaris issue (well, OK, it *may* also be an OpenSolaris issue).
System is a T2000 running Solaris 10U9 with latest ZFS patches (zpool
version 22). Storage is a pile of J4400 (5 of them).
I have run into what appears to be (Sun)