On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:41, Ethan wrote:
>
> Update: I'm stuck. Again.
>
> To answer "For curiosity's sake, what happens when you remove (rename) your
> dir with the symlinks?": it finds the devices on p0 with no problem, with
> the symlinks directory deleted.
>
> After clearing the errors and
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 16:03, Ethan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 15:31, Daniel Carosone wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:42:58PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 04:14, Daniel Carosone wrote:
>> > Although I do notice that right now, it imports just fine using the p0
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 15:31, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:42:58PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 04:14, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> > Although I do notice that right now, it imports just fine using the p0
> > devices using just `zpool import q`, no longer h
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:42:58PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 04:14, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> Although I do notice that right now, it imports just fine using the p0
> devices using just `zpool import q`, no longer having to use import -d with
> the directory of symlinks to p0 de
Ethan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:22, Victor Latushkin
mailto:victor.latush...@sun.com>> wrote:
Ethan wrote:
So, current plan:
- export the pool.
- format c9t1d0 to have one slice being the entire disk.
- import. should be degraded, missing c9t1d0p0.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:22, Victor Latushkin wrote:
> Ethan wrote:
>
>> So, current plan:
>> - export the pool.
>> - format c9t1d0 to have one slice being the entire disk.
>> - import. should be degraded, missing c9t1d0p0.
>> - replace missing c9t1d0p0 with c9t1d0 (should this be c9t1d0s0? my
>
Ethan wrote:
So, current plan:
- export the pool.
- format c9t1d0 to have one slice being the entire disk.
- import. should be degraded, missing c9t1d0p0.
- replace missing c9t1d0p0 with c9t1d0 (should this be c9t1d0s0? my
understanding is that zfs will treat the two about the same, since it
ad
Hi Ethan,
Great job putting this pool back together...
I would agree with the disk-by-disk replacement by using the zpool
replace command. You can read about this command here:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-2271/gazgd?a=view
Having a recent full backup of your data before making any mor
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 04:14, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:37:54PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> > > It seems to me that you could also use the approach of 'zpool replace'
> for
> > That is true. It seems like it then have to rebuild from parity for every
> > drive, though, which
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:37:54PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> > It seems to me that you could also use the approach of 'zpool replace' for
> That is true. It seems like it then have to rebuild from parity for every
> drive, though, which I think would take rather a long while, wouldn't it?
No longer th
Create a new empty pool on the solaris system, let it format the disks etc
ie used the disk names cXtXd0 This should put the EFI label on the disks and
then setup the partitions for you. Just encase here is an example.
Go back to the Linux box, and see if you can use tools to see the same
partit
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 23:21, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Ethan wrote:
>
>>
>> I should have a partition table, for one thing, I suppose. The partition
>> table is EFI GUID Partition
>> Table, looking at the relevant documentation. So, I'll need to somehow
>> shift my zfs data
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Ethan wrote:
I should have a partition table, for one thing, I suppose. The partition table
is EFI GUID Partition
Table, looking at the relevant documentation. So, I'll need to somehow shift my
zfs data down by 17408
bytes (34 512-byte LBA's, the size of the GPT's stuff at
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 18:24, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 06:15:25PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> > Success!
>
> Awesome. Let that scrub finish before celebrating completely, but
> this looks like a good place to stop and consider what you want for an
> end state.
>
> --
> Dan.
>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 06:15:25PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> Success!
Awesome. Let that scrub finish before celebrating completely, but
this looks like a good place to stop and consider what you want for an
end state.
--
Dan.
pgph6ALkJoiw6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 17:44, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 04:48:23PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> > It looks like using p0 is exactly what I want, actually. Are s2 and p0
> both
> > the entire disk?
>
> No. s2 depends on there being a solaris partition table (Sun or EFI),
> and if
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 04:44:19PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> There was no partitioning on the truecrypt disks. The truecrypt volumes
> occupied the whole raw disks (1500301910016 bytes each). The devices that I
> gave to the zpool on linux were the whole raw devices that truecrypt exposed
> (1500301647
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 04:48:23PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> It looks like using p0 is exactly what I want, actually. Are s2 and p0 both
> the entire disk?
No. s2 depends on there being a solaris partition table (Sun or EFI),
and if there's also an fdisk partition table (disk shared with other
OS), s2
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 16:25, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:14:03AM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> > I think
> > you probably want to make a slice 0 that spans the right disk sectors.
> [..]
> > you could try zdb -l on /dev/dsk/c...p[01234] as well.
>
> Depending on how an
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 16:14, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 03:37:59PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:22, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> > I have not yet successfully imported. I can see two ways of making
> progress
> > forward. One is forcing zpool to attempt
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:14:03AM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> I think
> you probably want to make a slice 0 that spans the right disk sectors.
[..]
> you could try zdb -l on /dev/dsk/c...p[01234] as well.
Depending on how and what you copied, you may have zfs data that start
at sector 0, wit
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 03:37:59PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:22, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> I have not yet successfully imported. I can see two ways of making progress
> forward. One is forcing zpool to attempt to import using slice 2 for each
> disk rather than slice 8. If th
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:22, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:31:27AM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> > And I just realized - yes, labels 2 and 3 are in the wrong place relative
> to
> > the end of the drive; I did not take into account the overhead taken up
> by
> > truecrypt when dd'
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:31:27AM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> And I just realized - yes, labels 2 and 3 are in the wrong place relative to
> the end of the drive; I did not take into account the overhead taken up by
> truecrypt when dd'ing the data. The raw drive is 1500301910016 bytes; the
> truecrypt
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 00:27, Ethan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 23:57, Daniel Carosone wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:39:39PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
>> > If slice 2 is the whole disk, why is zpool trying to using slice 8 for
>> all
>> > but one disk?
>>
>> Because it's finding at leas
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 23:57, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:39:39PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> > If slice 2 is the whole disk, why is zpool trying to using slice 8 for
> all
> > but one disk?
>
> Because it's finding at least part of the labels for the pool member there.
>
> Ple
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:39:39PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> If slice 2 is the whole disk, why is zpool trying to using slice 8 for all
> but one disk?
Because it's finding at least part of the labels for the pool member there.
Please check the partition tables of all the disks, and use zdb -l on
th
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 23:24, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2010, at 7:57 PM, Ethan wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 22:35, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:30:28PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> > > > c9t4d0s8 UNAVAIL corrupted data
> > > >
On Feb 16, 2010, at 7:57 PM, Ethan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 22:35, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:30:28PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> > > c9t4d0s8 UNAVAIL corrupted data
> > > c9t5d0s2 ONLINE
> > > c9t2d0s8 UNAVAIL corrupted
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 22:35, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:30:28PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> > > c9t4d0s8 UNAVAIL corrupted data
> > > c9t5d0s2 ONLINE
> > > c9t2d0s8 UNAVAIL corrupted data
> > > c9t1d0s8 UNAVAIL
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:30:28PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> > c9t4d0s8 UNAVAIL corrupted data
> > c9t5d0s2 ONLINE
> > c9t2d0s8 UNAVAIL corrupted data
> > c9t1d0s8 UNAVAIL corrupted data
> > c9t0d0s8 UNAVAIL corrupted data
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:06:13PM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> This is the current state of my pool:
>
> et...@save:~# zpool import
> pool: q
> id: 5055543090570728034
> state: UNAVAIL
> status: One or more devices contains corrupted data.
> action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devi
This is the current state of my pool:
et...@save:~# zpool import
pool: q
id: 5055543090570728034
state: UNAVAIL
status: One or more devices contains corrupted data.
action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data.
see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-5E
config:
33 matches
Mail list logo
