>> Note that "attach" has no option for -n which would just show me the
>> damage I am about to do :-(
>
> In general, ZFS does a lot of checking before committing a change to the
> configuration. We make sure that you don't do things like use disks
> that are already in use, partitions aren't ove
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:28:04PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Now then, I have a collection of six disks on controller c0 that I would
> like to now mirror with this ZPool zfs0. Thats the wrong way of thinking
> really. In the SVM world I would create stripes and then mirror them to get
> eithe
On 07 January, 2007 - Dennis Clarke sent me these 6,1K bytes:
> I have a pile of disks hanging off it on two controllers, c0 and c1.
[..]
> Note the complete lack of redundency !
>
> Now then, I have a collection of six disks on controller c0 that I would
> like to now mirror with this ZPool zfs0
I have a snv_52 server that I want to upgrade to the latest, either via a
non-debug build or a simple fresh install. I don't know which yet as I
have not decided.
I have a pile of disks hanging off it on two controllers, c0 and c1.
The disks on c1 are in a zpool thus :
bash-3.1$ zpool status
