On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 07:27:50AM +0200, Johan Hartzenberg wrote:
>
>Thank you for the details. A few more questions: Does booting into
>build 102 do I zpool online on the root pool? And the above disable -t
>is "temporary" till the next reboot - any specific reason for doing it
>
Does this affect a fresh install into a single, full disk pool? I just did
this with
nv102 on my laptop. So far, it seems to be working ...
Unfortunately, this would be a pain to unwind. Is there a quick fix
binary patch available?
The only thing that appears to have broken is resume. Could t
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Jeff Bonwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These are the conditions:
>
> (1) The bug is specific to the root pool. Other pools are unaffected.
> (2) It is triggered by doing a 'zpool online' while I/O is in flight.
> (3) Item (2) can be triggered by syseventd.
> (
These are the conditions:
(1) The bug is specific to the root pool. Other pools are unaffected.
(2) It is triggered by doing a 'zpool online' while I/O is in flight.
(3) Item (2) can be triggered by syseventd.
(4) The bug is new in build 102. Builds 101 and earlier are fine.
I believe the follo
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 05:41:56PM -0600, Al Hopper wrote:
> Heads up! and apologies to folks subscribed to os-announce.
Argh, and I just live-upgraded to build 102. I searched for this bug
number in three bug databases without success. Does it affect ZFS
root only, as long as I don't use `offli
Heads up! and apologies to folks subscribed to os-announce.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Derek Cicero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:14 PM
Subject: [osol-announce] IMPT: Do not use SXCE Build 102
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], os-discuss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Due to the
