On Aug 9, 2012, at 4:11 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg
Schilling) wrote:
> Sa?o Kiselkov wrote:
>
>> On 08/09/2012 01:05 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>> Sa?o Kiselkov wrote:
>>>
> To me it seems that the "open-sourced ZFS community" is not open, or
> could you
> p
On 2012-Aug-09 16:05:00 +0530, Jim Klimov wrote:
>2012-08-09 13:57, Karl Wagner wrote:
>> Firstly, I believe it currently stands at zpool v28. Is this correct?
For FreeBSD 8.x and 9.x, yes. FreeBSD-head includes "feature flags"
and "com.delphix:async_destroy".
>> Will this be updated any time s
> From: Joerg Schilling [mailto:joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 11:35 AM
>
> > > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> > > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Schilling
> > >
> > > Well, why then has there been a discussion
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris
wrote:
> > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Schilling
> >
> > Well, why then has there been a discussion about a "closed zfs mailing
> > list"?
> > Is this no longer true?
>
> Ora
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Schilling
>
> Well, why then has there been a discussion about a "closed zfs mailing list"?
> Is this no longer true?
Oracle can do anything internally they want. I would presume they h
On 08/09/2012 01:11 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Sa?o Kiselkov wrote:
>
>> On 08/09/2012 01:05 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>> Sa?o Kiselkov wrote:
>>>
> To me it seems that the "open-sourced ZFS community" is not open, or
> could you
> point me to their mailing list archives?
>
Sa?o Kiselkov wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 01:05 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Sa?o Kiselkov wrote:
> >
> >>> To me it seems that the "open-sourced ZFS community" is not open, or
> >>> could you
> >>> point me to their mailing list archives?
> >>>
> >>> Jörg
> >>>
> >>
> >> z...@lists.illumos.org
On 08/09/2012 01:05 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Sa?o Kiselkov wrote:
>
>>> To me it seems that the "open-sourced ZFS community" is not open, or could
>>> you
>>> point me to their mailing list archives?
>>>
>>> Jörg
>>>
>>
>> z...@lists.illumos.org
>
> Well, why then has there been a discussi
Sa?o Kiselkov wrote:
> > To me it seems that the "open-sourced ZFS community" is not open, or could
> > you
> > point me to their mailing list archives?
> >
> > Jörg
> >
>
> z...@lists.illumos.org
Well, why then has there been a discussion about a "closed zfs mailing list"?
Is this no longer
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Schilling
>
> Jim Klimov wrote:
>
> > In the end, the open-sourced ZFS community got no public replies
> > from Oracle regarding collaboration or lack thereof, and decided
> > to part w
On 08/09/2012 12:52 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Jim Klimov wrote:
>
>> In the end, the open-sourced ZFS community got no public replies
>> from Oracle regarding collaboration or lack thereof, and decided
>> to part ways and implement things independently from Oracle.
>> AFAIK main ZFS developmen
On 2012-08-09 11:35, Jim Klimov wrote:
2012-08-09 13:57, Karl Wagner wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a couple of questions regarding FreeBSD's ZFS support.
Firstly, I believe it currently stands at zpool v28. Is this
correct?
Will this be updated any time soon?
Also, looking at the Wikipedia pag
Jim Klimov wrote:
> In the end, the open-sourced ZFS community got no public replies
> from Oracle regarding collaboration or lack thereof, and decided
> to part ways and implement things independently from Oracle.
> AFAIK main ZFS development converges in illumos-gate, contributed
> to by some O
2012-08-09 13:57, Karl Wagner wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a couple of questions regarding FreeBSD's ZFS support.
Firstly, I believe it currently stands at zpool v28. Is this correct?
Will this be updated any time soon?
Also, looking at the Wikipedia page, the updates beyond this are:
29 Sol
Hi everyone,
I have a couple of questions regarding FreeBSD's ZFS support.
Firstly, I believe it currently stands at zpool v28. Is this correct?
Will this be updated any time soon?
Also, looking at the Wikipedia page, the updates beyond this are:
29 Solaris Nevada b148 RAID-Z/mirror
Christian Hessmann wrote:
Victor,
Btw, they affect some files referenced by snapshots as
'zpool status -v' suggests:
>> tank/DVD:<0x9cd> tank/d...@2010025100:/Memento.m4v
>> tank/d...@2010025100:/Payback.m4v
>> tank/d...@2010025100:/TheManWhoWasntThere.m4v
In case of OpenSolari
Victor,
> Btw, they affect some files referenced by snapshots as
> 'zpool status -v' suggests:
>
> >> tank/DVD:<0x9cd> tank/d...@2010025100:/Memento.m4v
> >> tank/d...@2010025100:/Payback.m4v
> >> tank/d...@2010025100:/TheManWhoWasntThere.m4v
>
> In case of OpenSolaris it is not tha
Mark J Musante wrote:
It looks like you're running into a DTL issue. ZFS believes that ad16p2 has
some data on it that hasn't been copied off yet, and it's not considering the
fact that it's part of a raidz group and ad4p2.
There is a CR on this,
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug
It looks like you're running into a DTL issue. ZFS believes that ad16p2 has
some data on it that hasn't been copied off yet, and it's not considering the
fact that it's part of a raidz group and ad4p2.
There is a CR on this,
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6909724 bu
On 04.03.2010, at 02:57, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I see lots and lots of zfs traffic on the discussion list "freebsd...@freebsd.org
". This is where the FreeBSD filesystem developers hang out.
Thanks - I'll have a look there. As usual, the cool kids are in
mailing lists... ;-)
The zpool st
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Heßmann wrote:
>
>> To be honest, I don't know how to proceed now. It feels like my system is
>> in a very unstable state right now, with a replacement not yet finished and
>> err
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Heßmann wrote:
I've already written this on the FreeBSD forums, but so far, the feedback is
not so great - seems FreeBSD guys aren't that keen on ZFS. I have some hopes
I see lots and lots of zfs traffic on the discussion list
"freebsd...@freebsd.org". This is
Hello guys,
I've already written this on the FreeBSD forums, but so far, the
feedback is not so great - seems FreeBSD guys aren't that keen on ZFS.
I have some hopes you'll be more experienced on these kind of errors:
I have a ZFS pool comprised of two 3-disk RAIDs which I've recently
mo
23 matches
Mail list logo
