On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:52:33AM -0800, Ivan Wang wrote:
> > $ /usr/bin/amd64/ls -l .gtk-bookmarks
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 user opc0 oct. 16 2057
> > .gtk-bookmarks
> >
> > This is a bit absurd. I thought Solaris was fully 64
> > bit. I hope those tools will be integrated soon.
Solaris
> I see, thanks.
> And as Jörg said, I only need a 64 bit binary. I
> didn't know, but there is one for ls, and it does
> work as expected:
>
> $ /usr/bin/amd64/ls -l .gtk-bookmarks
> -rw-r--r-- 1 user opc0 oct. 16 2057
> .gtk-bookmarks
>
> This is a bit absurd. I thought Solaris
I see, thanks.
And as Jörg said, I only need a 64 bit binary. I didn't know, but there is one
for ls, and it does work as expected:
$ /usr/bin/amd64/ls -l .gtk-bookmarks
-rw-r--r-- 1 user opc0 oct. 16 2057 .gtk-bookmarks
This is a bit absurd. I thought Solaris was fully 64 bit. I
Laurent Blume wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It seems a user managed to create files dated Oct 16, 2057, from a Linux
> distro that mounted by NFS the volumes on an x2100 server running S10U5, with
> ZFS volumes.
>
> The problem is, those files are completely unreachable on the S10 server:
>
> # ls -l .
Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It seems a user managed to create files dated Oct 16, 2057, from a Linux
> distro that mounted by NFS the volumes on an x2100 server running S10U5, with
> ZFS volumes.
>
> The problem is, those files are completely unreachable on the S10 ser
Hi all,
It seems a user managed to create files dated Oct 16, 2057, from a Linux distro
that mounted by NFS the volumes on an x2100 server running S10U5, with ZFS
volumes.
The problem is, those files are completely unreachable on the S10 server:
# ls -l .gtk-bookmarks
.gtk-bookmarks: Value too
