On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:43 PM, Abdullah Al-Dahlawi wrote:
> Greeting Richard
>
> After spending alomost 48 hours working on this problem, I believe I've
> discovered the BUG in Filebench !!!.
>
> I do not believe it is the change directory that you have indicated below
> cause this directory is u
Greeting Richard
After spending alomost 48 hours working on this problem, I believe I've
discovered the BUG in Filebench !!!.
I do not believe it is the change directory that you have indicated below
cause this directory is used to dump the stat data at the end of the
benchmarks, it is NOT used d
Hi Richard
Are you saying that running filebench with a configuration file is different
(it flushes the cache) from running it as an interactive mode for the same
exact workload configuration
If the answer is yes , how can I make filebench behave the same while
running in NON-interactive mod
see below...
On Mar 2, 2010, at 12:38 AM, Abdullah Al-Dahlawi wrote:
> Greeting All
>
> I am using Filebench benchmark in an "Interactive mode" to test ZFS
> performance with randomread wordload.
> My Filebench setting & run results are as follwos
> -
Hi Phil
Good notice , but believe me this is not the problem .
I just cut & pasted the filebench "config" file after I rerun it with in
shorter time, the orginal one was SAME with 100 seconds.
and by the way I always enmpty the cache with zfs export & import before
every run
Filebench still beh
I see at least two differences:
1. duration 30s vs 100s (so not "SAME")
2. your manual test doesn't empty the cache
Of course, it is the latter that makes all the difference.
Hope this helps,
Phil
Sent from my iPhone
On 2 Mar 2010, at 08:38, Abdullah Al-Dahlawi wrote:
Greeting All
I am u
Hi
My pool is very simple disk partition on a workstation
abdul...@hp_hdx_16:~# zpool list
NAMESIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
hdd19.6G 5.00G 14.6G25% ONLINE -
rpool 123G 7.82G 115G 6% ONLINE -
just testing randomread in filebench .
On Tue, Mar 2, 201
On 02/03/2010 08:38, Abdullah Al-Dahlawi wrote:
Greeting All
I am using Filebench benchmark in an "Interactive mode" to test ZFS
performance with randomread wordload.
My Filebench setting & run results are as follwos
-
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 08:38, Abdullah Al-Dahlawi wrote:
> I am using Filebench benchmark in an "Interactive mode" to test ZFS
> performance with randomread wordload.
What's your pool configuration? Are you just load testing, or do you
have an application in mind for this system?
Will
__
Greeting All
I am using Filebench benchmark in an "Interactive mode" to test ZFS
performance with randomread wordload.
My Filebench setting & run results are as follwos
--
filebench> set $filesize=5g
filebench>
10 matches
Mail list logo
