Sanjeev Bagewadi wrote:
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Sanjeev,
Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 3:26:52 PM, you wrote:
SB> Hi,
SB> We were trying out the "compression=on" feature of ZFS and were
SB> wondering if it would make
SB> sense to have ZFS do compression only on a cer
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Sanjeev,
Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 3:26:52 PM, you wrote:
SB> Hi,
SB> We were trying out the "compression=on" feature of ZFS and were
SB> wondering if it would make
SB> sense to have ZFS do compression only on a certain kind of files
(or S
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Sanjeev,
Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 3:26:52 PM, you wrote:
SB> Hi,
SB> We were trying out the "compression=on" feature of ZFS and were
SB> wondering if it would make
SB> sense to have ZFS do compression only on a certain kind of files (or
SB> rather the otherwa
Hello Sanjeev,
Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 3:26:52 PM, you wrote:
SB> Hi,
SB> We were trying out the "compression=on" feature of ZFS and were
SB> wondering if it would make
SB> sense to have ZFS do compression only on a certain kind of files (or
SB> rather the otherway around).
SB> Our observ
Hi,
We were trying out the "compression=on" feature of ZFS and were
wondering if it would make
sense to have ZFS do compression only on a certain kind of files (or
rather the otherway around).
Our observation :
- If ZFS finds that it cannot achieve a certain amount of compression it
does not
