On Thu, 19 May 2011 15:39:50 +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote:
Op 03-05-11 17:55, Brandon High schreef:
-H: Hard links
If you're going to this for 2 TB of data, remember to expand your
swap
space first (or have tons of memory). Rsync will need it to store
every
inode number in the directory.
Op 03-05-11 17:55, Brandon High schreef:
> -H: Hard links
If you're going to this for 2 TB of data, remember to expand your swap
space first (or have tons of memory). Rsync will need it to store every
inode number in the directory.
--
No part of this copyright message may be reproduced, read or
On 05/ 5/11 10:02 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
*ufsrestore works fine on ZFS filesystems (although I haven't tried it
with any POSIX ACLs on the original ufs filesystem, which would probably
simply get lost).
star -copy -no-fsync is typically 30% faster that ufsdump | u
Ian Collins wrote:
> >> *ufsrestore works fine on ZFS filesystems (although I haven't tried it
> >> with any POSIX ACLs on the original ufs filesystem, which would probably
> >> simply get lost).
> > star -copy -no-fsync is typically 30% faster that ufsdump | ufsrestore.
> >
> Does it preser
Erik Trimble wrote:
> rsync is indeed slower than star; so far as I can tell, this is due
> almost exclusively to the fact that rsync needs to build an in-memory
> table of all work being done *before* it starts to copy. After that, it
> copies at about the same rate as star (my observations).
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
> rsync is indeed slower than star; so far as I can tell, this is due almost
> exclusively to the fact that rsync needs to build an in-memory table of all
> work being done *before* it starts to copy. After that, it copies at about
rsync 3.0+ w
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
> On 5/3/2011 8:55 AM, Brandon High wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Joerg Schilling
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> But this is most likely slower than star and does rsync support sparse
>>> files?
>>
>> 'rsync -ASHXavP'
>>
>> -A: ACLs
>> -S: S
On 05/ 4/11 01:35 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Dan Shelton wrote:
Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons
of data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
I use 'ufsdump | ufsrestore'*. I would also suggest try setting
'sync=disabled' during
On 5/3/2011 8:55 AM, Brandon High wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
But this is most likely slower than star and does rsync support sparse files?
'rsync -ASHXavP'
-A: ACLs
-S: Sparse files
-H: Hard links
-X: Xattrs
-a: archive mode; equals -rlptgoD (no -H,-A,-X)
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> But this is most likely slower than star and does rsync support sparse files?
'rsync -ASHXavP'
-A: ACLs
-S: Sparse files
-H: Hard links
-X: Xattrs
-a: archive mode; equals -rlptgoD (no -H,-A,-X)
You don't need to specify --whole-file, it'
Andrew Gabriel wrote:
> Dan Shelton wrote:
> > Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons
> > of data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
>
> I use 'ufsdump | ufsrestore'*. I would also suggest try setting
> 'sync=disabled' during the operation, and reverting it a
Dan Shelton wrote:
Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons
of data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
I use 'ufsdump | ufsrestore'*. I would also suggest try setting
'sync=disabled' during the operation, and reverting it afterwards.
Certainly, fastfs (a simi
Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Dan Shelton wrote:
> > Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons of
> > data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
>
> rsync, with --whole-file --inplace (and other options), works well for
> the initial copy.
On Apr 29, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Brandon High wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Dan Shelton wrote:
>> Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons of
>> data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
>
> Setting 'sync=disabled' for the initial copy will help, since it
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Dan Shelton wrote:
> Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons of
> data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
Setting 'sync=disabled' for the initial copy will help, since it will
make all writes asynchronous.
You will probably wan
On 04/30/11 06:00 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Dan Shelton wrote:
Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons of
data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
rsync, with --whole-file --inplace (and other options), works well for
the initi
Dan Shelton wrote:
> Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons
> of data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
Try star -copy
Note that due to the problems on ZFS to deal with stable states, I recommend to
use -no-fsync and it may of course help to specify a
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Dan Shelton wrote:
> Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons of
> data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
rsync, with --whole-file --inplace (and other options), works well for
the initial copy.
rsync, with --no-whole-file --in
Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons
of data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
Thanks.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
19 matches
Mail list logo
