Re: [zfs-discuss] Failure to zfs destroy - after interrupting zfs receive

2012-10-03 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ariel T. Glenn > > I have the same issue as described by Ned in his email. I had a zfs > recv going that deadlocked against a zfs list; after a day of leaving > them hung I finally had to hard

Re: [zfs-discuss] Failure to zfs destroy - after interrupting zfs receive

2012-10-03 Thread Ariel T. Glenn
I have the same issue as described by Ned in his email. I had a zfs recv going that deadlocked against a zfs list; after a day of leaving them hung I finally had to hard reset the box (shutdown wouldn't, since it couldn't terminate the processes). When it came back up, I wanted to zfs destroy tha

[zfs-discuss] Failure to zfs destroy - after interrupting zfs receive

2012-09-28 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
Formerly, if you interrupted a zfs receive, it would leave a clone with a % in its name, and you could find it via "zdb -d" and then you could destroy the clone, and then you could destroy the filesystem you had interrupted receiving. That was considered a bug, and it was fixed, I think by Sun.